Usage / Role
5%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2018-2018Rice
WR • 6'5" • 201 lbs • Fort Worth, TX, USA
Brendan Harmon reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage / Role
5%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
18
Developing production for a receiver
Reliability
12
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
31
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2018 Regular Season · Rice
Snapshot
Brendan Harmon, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2018 Regular Season · Rice. Brendan Harmon reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Rice | 6 | 10 | 64 | 1 | 65 |
Related Context
Brendan Harmon played WR for Rice. Across 1 tracked season, Brendan Harmon recorded 64 receiving yards and 1 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2018 with Rice.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
Rice paired 64 primary output with 47.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 47.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTSA
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
6
Receiving Yards / G
10.7
Efficiency
47.9
Usage
9.6
Consistency
80
Best Game by takeover score
UTSA
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Houston: 11. Prairie View A&M: 8. Wake Forest: 11. UTSA: 16. UAB: 10. North Texas: 8
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Houston: 3 by 24.4. Prairie View A&M: 1 by 53.3. Wake Forest: 2 by 36.7. UTSA: 2 by 53.3. UAB: 1 by 66.7. North Texas: 1 by 53.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
6 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UTSA
Best efficiency game
66.7 vs UAB
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Rice
2018
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Rice | 64 | 47.9 | 9.6 | — |
#1 Featured game
vs UTSA
Week 6 · L 3-20 · Conference game
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
16
Receiving Yards
65 takeover
16 receiving yards with a 53.3 efficiency score.
#2
@ UTEP
Week 3
4
Receiving Yards
63.4 takeover
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
4 receiving yards with a 26.7 efficiency score.
#3
vs UAB
Week 7 · L 0-42 · Conference game
10
Receiving Yards
51.6 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
10 receiving yards with a 66.7 efficiency score.
#4
@ Wake Forest
Week 5 · L 24-56
11
Receiving Yards
48.3 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
11 receiving yards with a 36.7 efficiency score.
#5
vs Houston
Week 1 · L 27-45
11
Receiving Yards
45 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
11 receiving yards with a 24.4 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2018 Regular Season · Rice
64 primary output · 47.9 efficiency · 9.6 usage
65
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.