Usage Score
8.4
Player Dossier
2018-2021Rice
Antonio Montero
LB • 6'1" • 225 lbs • Eden Prairie, MN, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Antonio Montero shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 42.8 disruption score.
Efficiency
36.3
Consistency
25
Season Value
20.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · Rice
18192021
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Rice
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: North Texas
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Antonio Montero, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · Rice. Antonio Montero shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 42.8 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season
Rice paired 13.5 primary output with 42.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 36.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2021 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: North Texas
Win with 4.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Regular Season · Rice
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
0.8
Efficiency
36.3
Usage
8.4
Consistency
25
Best Game by takeover score
UTEP
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Army: 1. Wake Forest: 0. Texas: 0. Baylor: 1. Louisiana Tech: 0. UAB: 0. UTSA: 0. Southern Miss: 1. Marshall: 0.5. Middle Tennessee: 0. North Texas: 4.5. UTEP: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Army: 11 by 55.8. Wake Forest: 4 by 16.7. Texas: 4 by 16.7. Baylor: 7 by 39.2. Louisiana Tech: 7 by 29.2. UAB: 4 by 16.7. UTSA: 7 by 29.2. Southern Miss: 6 by 35. Marshall: 11 by 50.8. Middle Tennessee: 7 by 29.2. North Texas: 4 by 61.7. UTEP: 11 by 55.8
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins1.8 · Games = 3 · +1.4 vs Losses
Losses0.4 · Games = 9 · -1.4 vs Wins
First Half0.3 · Games = 6 · -0.8 vs Second Half
Second Half1.2 · Games = 6 · +0.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
North Texas
Best efficiency game
61.7 vs North Texas
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/30 | @ UTEP10+ tackles | W 30-16 | 11 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/23 | vs North TexasSplash game | W 20-14 | 4 | 2 | — | 2.50 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/16 | @ Middle Tennessee | W 31-28 | 7 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/2 | vs Marshall10+ tackles | L 7-20 | 11 | 4 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Southern Miss | L 6-20 | 6 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | @ UTSA | L 27-31 | 7 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/5 | @ UAB | L 20-35 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Louisiana Tech | L 20-23 | 7 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Baylor | L 13-21 | 7 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 9/15 | vs Texas | L 13-48 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Wake Forest | L 21-41 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 8/30 | @ Army10+ tackles | L 7-14 | 11 | 7 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Rice
2018-2021
Opening stop
Season Progression
2018201920202021
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Rice | 1.5 | 15.7 | 4.1 | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | Rice | 9 | 36.3 | 8.4 | 7.5 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Rice | 1.5 | 28.8 | 7.3 | -7.5 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Rice | 13.5 | 42.8 | 16.6 | 12 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
North Texas
Win with 4.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4.5
Primary metric
4.5 disruption/tackle impact with 61 takeover score.
#2
Charlotte
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 58.4 takeover score.
#3
Arkansas
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 53.1 takeover score.
#4
Middle Tennessee
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 49.6 takeover score.
#5
Unknown
2.5
Primary metric
Game with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 49.1 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2021 Regular Season · Rice
13.5 primary output · 42.8 efficiency · 16.6 usage
35.1
#2
2019 Regular Season · Rice
20.1
9 primary · 36.3 efficiency · 8.4 usage
#3
2020 Regular Season · Rice
19.2
1.5 primary · 28.8 efficiency · 7.3 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
3
Splash games
6
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2018 · Rating 0.7998
Eden Prairie · Eden Prairie, MN
- Committed To
- Rice
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2018
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
201
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 36 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.