Usage Score
15.1
Player Dossier
2018-2023Tulsa
Davis Brin
QB • 6'2" • 210 lbs • Boerne, TX, USA
Balanced quarterback profileVolume operator
Davis Brin is a balanced quarterback profile with 20.6 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
55.3
Consistency
53.7
Season Value
46.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · Georgia Southern
1819202121222323
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Tulsa • Georgia Southern
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Ohio
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Davis Brin, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · Georgia Southern. Davis Brin is a balanced quarterback profile with 20.6 usage in the latest tracked season.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason
Georgia Southern paired 3,721 primary output with 54.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 55.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Tulsa, Georgia Southern.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Wyoming
Loss with 448 yards of offense and 57.9 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Regular Season · Tulsa
Games
9
Primary Metric / G
229
Efficiency
55.3
Usage
15.1
Consistency
53.7
Best Game by takeover score
Memphis
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Wyoming: 448. Northern Illinois: 329. Unknown: 414. Ole Miss: 117. Cincinnati: 176. Navy: 294. Temple: 126. SMU: 115. Memphis: 42
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wyoming: 61 by 57.9. Northern Illinois: 39 by 60.2. Unknown: 38 by 69.3. Ole Miss: 15 by 62.7. Cincinnati: 45 by 45.7. Navy: 34 by 62.1. Temple: 30 by 47.6. SMU: 21 by 57.9. Memphis: 15 by 34.6
Split Comparison
Wins227.5 · n=2 · +28.8 vs Losses
Losses198.7 · n=6 · -28.8 vs Wins
First Half296.8 · n=5 · +152.6 vs Second Half
Second Half144.3 · n=4 · -152.6 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Wyoming
Best efficiency game
69.3 vs Unknown
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/11 | @ Memphis | L 10-26 | 5 | 13 | 48 | 38.5 | 0 | 1 | 34.6 | 2 | -6 | -3 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 10/29 | vs SMU | L 34-45 | 7 | 16 | 96 | 43.8 | 1 | 0 | 57.9 | 5 | 19 | 3.80 | 1 | 21 |
| Fri 10/21 | @ Temple | W 27-16 | 15 | 22 | 155 | 68.2 | 2 | 2 | 47.6 | 8 | -29 | -3.60 | 0 | 1 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Navy | L 21-53 | 20 | 31 | 284 | 64.5 | 2 | 2 | 62.1 | 3 | 10 | 3.30 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Cincinnati | L 21-31 | 18 | 36 | 237 | 50.0 | 0 | 2 | 45.7 | 9 | -61 | -6.80 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Ole Miss | L 27-35 | 7 | 13 | 112 | 53.8 | 1 | 0 | 62.7 | 2 | 5 | 2.50 | 1 | 4 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Unknown300-yard game · 3+ TD | — | 27 | 35 | 424 | 77.1 | 4 | 0 | 69.3 | 3 | -10 | -3.30 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Northern Illinois300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 38-35 | 19 | 32 | 322 | 59.4 | 4 | 1 | 60.2 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/3 | @ Wyoming300-yard game · 3+ TD | L 37-40 | 30 | 52 | 460 | 57.7 | 3 | 0 | 57.9 | 9 | -12 | -1.30 | 0 | 9 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Tulsa
2018-2022
Opening stop
- 2
Georgia Southern
2023
Final stop
Season Progression
20182019202020212021202220232023
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Tulsa | 0 | 0 | 1.8 | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | Tulsa | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Tulsa | 279 | 70 | 9.8 | 279 |
| 2021 Postseason | Tulsa | 3,329 | 57.8 | 13.1 | 3,050 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Tulsa | 3,329 | 57.8 | 13.1 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Tulsa | 2,061 | 55.3 | 15.1 | -1,268 |
| 2023 Postseason | Georgia Southern | 3,721 | 54.2 | 20.6 | 1,660 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Georgia Southern | 3,721 | 54.2 | 20.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Ohio
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
327
Primary metric
327 total offense with 54.3 efficiency.
#2
Wyoming
448
Primary metric
Loss with 448 yards of offense and 57.9 efficiency.
448 total offense with 57.9 efficiency.
#3
UAB
336
Primary metric
Win with 336 yards of offense and 64.7 efficiency.
336 total offense with 64.7 efficiency.
#4
Tulane
277
Primary metric
Win with 277 yards of offense and 67.7 efficiency.
277 total offense with 67.7 efficiency.
#5
Ball State
352
Primary metric
Win with 352 yards of offense and 65.7 efficiency.
352 total offense with 65.7 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2023 Postseason · Georgia Southern
3,721 primary output · 54.2 efficiency · 20.6 usage
65.8
#2
2023 Regular Season · Georgia Southern
65.8
3,721 primary · 54.2 efficiency · 20.6 usage
#3
2021 Postseason · Tulsa
62.6
3,329 primary · 57.8 efficiency · 13.1 usage
Milestones
19
250+ passing yards
13
300+ total offense
0
3+ takeover TD games
14
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2018 · Rating 0.8418
Champion · Boerne, TX
- Committed To
- Tulsa
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2018
Career Facts
2
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
9,390
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 38 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.