Usage Score
12.2
Player Dossier
2018-2022Texas Tech
WR • 5'11" • 180 lbs • The Woodlands, TX, USA
KeSean Carter reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
12.2
Efficiency
84.1
Consistency
44
Season Value
60.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason · Houston
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
KeSean Carter, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason · Houston. KeSean Carter reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason
Houston paired 611 primary output with 84.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 84.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Texas Tech, Houston.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: SMU
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
50.9
Efficiency
84.1
Usage
12.2
Consistency
44
Best Game by takeover score
Louisiana
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Louisiana: 104. UTSA: 10. Texas Tech: 13. Kansas: 26. Rice: 17. Tulane: 41. Memphis: 36. Navy: 62. South Florida: 102. SMU: 136. East Carolina: 31. Tulsa: 33
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Louisiana: 3 by 100. UTSA: 3 by 22.2. Texas Tech: 2 by 43.3. Kansas: 2 by 86.7. Rice: 1 by 100. Tulane: 2 by 100. Memphis: 4 by 60. Navy: 3 by 100. South Florida: 7 by 97.1. SMU: 8 by 100. East Carolina: 2 by 100. Tulsa: 2 by 100
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
SMU
Best efficiency game
100 vs Louisiana
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/23 | vs Louisiana100 receiving yards | W 23-16 | — | 3 | 104 | 34.7 | 34.70 | 1 | 41 |
| Sun 11/27 | vs Tulsa | L 30-37 | — | 2 | 33 | 16.5 | 16.50 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 11/19 | @ East Carolina | W 42-3 | — | 2 | 31 | 15.5 | 15.50 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ SMU100 receiving yards · High volume | L 63-77 | — | 8 | 136 | 17 | 17 | 1 | 37 |
| Sat 10/29 | vs South Florida100 receiving yards | W 42-27 | — | 7 | 102 | 14.6 | 14.60 | 1 | 28 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Navy | W 38-20 | — | 3 | 62 | 20.7 | 20.70 | 0 | 40 |
| Fri 10/7 | @ Memphis2+ TD | W 33-32 | — | 4 | 36 | 9 | 9 | 2 | 15 |
| Fri 9/30 | vs Tulane | L 24-27 | — | 2 | 41 | 20.5 | 20.50 | 0 | 41 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Rice | W 34-27 | — | 1 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Kansas | L 30-48 | — | 2 | 26 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Texas Tech | L 30-33 | — | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/3 | @ UTSA | W 37-35 | — | 3 | 10 | 3.3 | 3.30 | 0 | 4 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Texas Tech
2018-2020
Opening stop
Houston
2021-2022
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 238 | 51.4 | 10 | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 303 | 66.1 | 8.4 | 65 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 310 | 60.9 | 17 | 7 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Houston | 331 | 69.6 | 13.1 | 21 |
| 2022 Postseason | Houston | 611 | 84.1 | 12.2 | 280 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Houston | 611 | 84.1 | 12.2 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
South Florida
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
123
Primary metric
123 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
SMU
136
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
136 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Texas
150
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
150 receiving yards with a 90.9 efficiency score.
#4
Unknown
86
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
86 receiving yards with a 95.6 efficiency score.
#5
Baylor
84
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
84 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2022 Postseason · Houston
611 primary output · 84.1 efficiency · 12.2 usage
60.1
#2
2022 Regular Season · Houston
60.1
611 primary · 84.1 efficiency · 12.2 usage
#3
2020 Regular Season · Texas Tech
51.3
310 primary · 60.9 efficiency · 17 usage
5
100+ receiving yards
3
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2018 · Rating 0.8593
The Woodlands · The Woodlands, TX
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,793
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 47 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
KeSean Carter quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit