Usage Score
2.7
Player Dossier
2016-2019UTEP
Chris Richardson
DL • 6'3" • 298 lbs • Oak Hills, CA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Chris Richardson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 14.2 disruption score.
Efficiency
14.2
Consistency
10
Season Value
8.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · UTEP
16171819
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- UTEP
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Florida International
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Chris Richardson, DL. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · UTEP. Chris Richardson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 14.2 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
UTEP paired 4 primary output with 14.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 14.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2019 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Florida International
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Regular Season · UTEP
Games
10
Havoc Plays / G
0.3
Efficiency
14.2
Usage
2.7
Consistency
10
Best Game by takeover score
Rice
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 0. Nevada: 0. Southern Miss: 0.5. UTSA: 0. Florida International: 1. Louisiana Tech: 0. Charlotte: 0. UAB: 0. New Mexico State: 0. Rice: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 3 by 12.5. Nevada: 1 by 4.2. Southern Miss: 7 by 34.2. UTSA: 1 by 4.2. Florida International: 4 by 26.7. Louisiana Tech: 5 by 20.8. Charlotte: 1 by 4.2. UAB: 2 by 8.3. New Mexico State: 2 by 8.3. Rice: 2 by 18.3
Split Comparison
Losses0.3 · n=9
First Half0.3 · n=5 · +0.1 vs Second Half
Second Half0.2 · n=5 · -0.1 vs First Half
All Games0.3 · n=10
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Florida International
Best efficiency game
34.2 vs Southern Miss
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/30 | vs Rice | L 16-30 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/23 | @ New Mexico State | L 35-44 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/16 | @ UAB | L 10-37 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/9 | vs Charlotte | L 21-28 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/27 | vs Louisiana Tech | L 21-42 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Florida International | L 17-32 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 10/6 | vs UTSA | L 16-26 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Southern Miss | L 13-31 | 7 | 4 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/22 | vs Nevada | L 21-37 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/1 | vs Unknown | — | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTEP
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
2016201720182019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | UTEP | 4 | 14.1 | 3.5 | 4 |
| 2019 Regular Season | UTEP | 2.5 | 14.2 | 2.7 | -1.5 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Florida International
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1
Primary metric
1 disruption/tackle impact with 43.5 takeover score.
#2
UTSA
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 41.9 takeover score.
#3
Rice
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 40.1 takeover score.
#4
Tennessee
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 38.3 takeover score.
#5
Southern Miss
0.5
Primary metric
Loss with 0.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0.5 disruption/tackle impact with 31.3 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Regular Season · UTEP
4 primary output · 14.1 efficiency · 3.5 usage
18
#2
2019 Regular Season · UTEP
8.7
2.5 primary · 14.2 efficiency · 2.7 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · UTEP
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
59
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 22 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.