Player Dossier

2018-2022

UTEP

Trent Thompson

TE • 6'1" • 248 lbs • Houston, TX, USA

Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher

Trent Thompson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Usage Score

9.7

Efficiency

83.3

Consistency

56.8

Season Value

60.5

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · UTEP

181920212122

Snapshot

Career Teams
1
Seasons Tracked
6
Program Path
UTEP
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: Fresno State

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Trent Thompson, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · UTEP. Trent Thompson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season

UTEP paired 203 primary output with 83.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2022 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 83.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2022 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: UTSA

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2022 Regular Season · UTEP

Games

7

Receiving Yards / G

29

Efficiency

83.3

Usage

9.7

Consistency

56.8

Best Game by takeover score

UTSA

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. New Mexico State: 20. New Mexico: 0. Charlotte: 26. Louisiana Tech: 53. Middle Tennessee: 0. Rice: 48. UTSA: 56

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. New Mexico State: 1 by 100. Charlotte: 1 by 100. Louisiana Tech: 2 by 100. Middle Tennessee: 2 by 0. Rice: 2 by 100. UTSA: 1 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins23 · Games = 2 · -8.4 vs Losses
Losses31.4 · Games = 5 · +8.4 vs Wins
First Half24.8 · Games = 4 · -9.9 vs Second Half
Second Half34.7 · Games = 3 · +9.9 vs First Half

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

7 games

Featured metric

Receiving Yards

Top game by takeover score

UTSA

Best efficiency game

100 vs UTSA

Result
Sat 11/26@ UTSAL 31-341566956056
Thu 11/3@ RiceL 30-372482424036
Sun 10/30vs Middle TennesseeL 13-24200005
Sat 10/8@ Louisiana TechL 31-4125326.526.50144
Sat 10/1@ CharlotteW 41-351262626126
Sun 9/18@ New MexicoL 10-27
Sun 9/11vs New Mexico StateW 20-131202020020

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    UTEP

    2018-2022

    Opening stop

Season Progression

201820192020202120212022
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2018 Regular SeasonUTEP213.36.7
2019 Regular SeasonUTEP3156.75.629
2020 Regular SeasonUTEP561007.225
2021 PostseasonUTEP13370.710.477
2021 Regular SeasonUTEP13370.710.40
2022 Regular SeasonUTEP20383.39.770

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

Fresno State

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

52

Primary metric

52 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#2

UTSA

56

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

56 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#3

UL Monroe

36

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

36 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#4

Rice

29

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

29 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#5

Louisiana Tech

53

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

53 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by value score

2022 Regular Season · UTEP

203 primary output · 83.3 efficiency · 9.7 usage

60.5

#2

2021 Postseason · UTEP

51.4

133 primary · 70.7 efficiency · 10.4 usage

#3

2021 Regular Season · UTEP

51.4

133 primary · 70.7 efficiency · 10.4 usage

Milestones

0

100+ receiving yards

0

8+ catch outings

1

2+ TD games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit Profile

2★

Class 2018 · Rating 0.7297

Cy Falls · Houston, TX

Committed To
UTEP
Commit Date
Jan 1, 2018

Career Facts

1

Career teams

6

Seasons tracked

425

Career Receiving Yards

Data Context

Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 19 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.

Quick Answers

Trent Thompson quick answers

Recruiting profile

2-star recruit

Position
TE
Teams played for
1
Seasons tracked
6
Career receiving yards
425