Usage Score
12.6
Player Dossier
2018-2022UTEP
RB • 5'11" • 205 lbs • El Paso, TX, USA
Reynaldo Flores leans explosive all-purpose back traits and 79 efficiency.
Usage Score
12.6
Efficiency
79
Consistency
57.2
Season Value
62
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · UTEP
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Reynaldo Flores, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · UTEP. Reynaldo Flores leans explosive all-purpose back traits and 79 efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season
UTEP paired 815 primary output with 79 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 79 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2022 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Florida International
Win with 149 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Scrimmage Yards / G
67.9
Efficiency
79
Usage
12.6
Consistency
57.2
Best Game by takeover score
UTSA
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma: 76. North Texas: 122. New Mexico State: 43. New Mexico: 36. Boise State: 58. Charlotte: 34. Louisiana Tech: 95. Florida Atlantic: 48. Middle Tennessee: 31. Rice: 26. Florida International: 149. UTSA: 97
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma: 7 by 90.5. North Texas: 8 by 100. New Mexico State: 4 by 89.6. New Mexico: 3 by 100. Boise State: 11 by 50.4. Charlotte: 4 by 54.2. Louisiana Tech: 8 by 99.5. Florida Atlantic: 6 by 66.7. Middle Tennessee: 3 by 86.1. Rice: 5 by 46.7. Florida International: 15 by 91.4. UTSA: 13 by 73.1
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Florida International
Best efficiency game
100 vs New Mexico
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/26 | @ UTSA | L 31-34 | 11 | 74 | 6.70 | 1 | 2 | 23 | 7.5 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Florida International100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 40-6 | 13 | 128 | 9.80 | 2 | 2 | 21 | 9.9 |
| Thu 11/3 | @ Rice | L 30-37 | 2 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 5.2 |
| Sun 10/30 | vs Middle Tennessee | L 13-24 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 31 | 10.3 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Florida Atlantic | W 24-21 | — | — | — | — | 6 | 48 | 8 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Louisiana Tech | L 31-41 | 2 | 22 | 11 | 1 | 6 | 73 | 11.9 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Charlotte | W 41-35 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 31 | 8.5 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Boise State | W 27-10 | 9 | 41 | 4.60 | 1 | 2 | 17 | 5.3 |
| Sun 9/18 | @ New Mexico | L 10-27 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 36 | 12 |
| Sun 9/11 | vs New Mexico State | W 20-13 | — | — | — | — | 4 | 43 | 10.8 |
| Sat 9/3 | @ Oklahoma | L 13-45 | — | — | — | — | 7 | 76 | 10.9 |
| Sun 8/28 | vs North Texas | L 13-31 | — | — | — | — | 8 | 122 | 15.3 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UTEP
2018-2022
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | UTEP | 101 | 47.1 | 4 | 101 |
| 2020 Regular Season | UTEP | 28 | 72.9 | 7.8 | -73 |
| 2021 Postseason | UTEP | 334 | 59.6 | 7.3 | 306 |
| 2021 Regular Season | UTEP | 334 | 59.6 | 7.3 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | UTEP | 815 | 79 | 12.6 | 481 |
#1 Featured game
Florida International
Win with 149 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
149
Primary metric
149 scrimmage yards and 20.5 usage.
#2
UTSA
34
Primary metric
Loss with 34 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
34 scrimmage yards and 4.3 usage.
#3
North Texas
122
Primary metric
Loss with 122 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
122 scrimmage yards and 15.7 usage.
#4
Southern Miss
56
Primary metric
Win with 56 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
56 scrimmage yards and 10.9 usage.
#5
Texas
28
Primary metric
Loss with 28 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
28 scrimmage yards and 7.8 usage.
#1 Season by value score
2022 Regular Season · UTEP
815 primary output · 79 efficiency · 12.6 usage
62
#2
2020 Regular Season · UTEP
46
28 primary · 72.9 efficiency · 7.8 usage
#3
2021 Postseason · UTEP
41
334 primary · 59.6 efficiency · 7.3 usage
2
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
1
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,278
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 32 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Reynaldo Flores quick answers