Usage Score
8.7
Player Dossier
2018-2023UTEP
DE • 6'3" • 250 lbs • Katy, TX, USA
Praise Amaewhule shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 22.7 disruption score.
Usage Score
8.7
Efficiency
27.5
Consistency
25.5
Season Value
28.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · UTEP
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Praise Amaewhule, DE. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · UTEP. Praise Amaewhule shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 22.7 disruption score.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season
UTEP paired 22.5 primary output with 32 efficiency.
Supporting note
2020 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 27.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Louisiana Tech
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
8
Havoc Plays / G
2.6
Efficiency
27.5
Usage
8.7
Consistency
25.5
Best Game by takeover score
North Texas
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 0. Texas: 0. Unknown: 4.5. UL Monroe: 0. Louisiana Tech: 11. Charlotte: 2. UTSA: 3. North Texas: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 0 by 0. Texas: 1 by 4.2. Unknown: 3 by 57.5. UL Monroe: 1 by 4.2. Louisiana Tech: 5 by 70.8. Charlotte: 2 by 28.3. UTSA: 2 by 38.3. North Texas: 4 by 16.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Louisiana Tech
Best efficiency game
70.8 vs Louisiana Tech
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/11 | vs North Texas | L 43-45 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/14 | @ UTSA | L 21-52 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 10/24 | @ Charlotte | L 28-38 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/10 | @ Louisiana Tech2+ sacks · Splash game | L 17-21 | 5 | 3 | — | 3.50 | 3.50 | — | 4 | — | — |
| Sat 9/26 | @ UL Monroe | W 31-6 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/20 | vs Unknown | — | 3 | 2 | — | 1.50 | 1 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sun 9/13 | @ Texas | L 3-59 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/6 | vs Unknown | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UTEP
2018-2023
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | 6.3 | 1.2 | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | UTEP | 11.5 | 19.3 | 8.8 | 11.5 |
| 2020 Regular Season | UTEP | 20.5 | 27.5 | 8.7 | 9 |
| 2021 Regular Season | UTEP | 22.5 | 32 | 17.4 | 2 |
| 2022 Regular Season | UTEP | 8.5 | 18.1 | 6 | -14 |
| 2023 Regular Season | UTEP | 14 | 22.7 | 7.9 | 5.5 |
#1 Featured game
New Mexico
Win with 4.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4.5
Primary metric
4.5 disruption/tackle impact with 83.9 takeover score.
#2
Louisiana Tech
11
Primary metric
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way.
11 disruption/tackle impact with 65 takeover score.
#3
Southern Miss
4
Primary metric
Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 61.6 takeover score.
#4
Southern Miss
5
Primary metric
Win with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
5 disruption/tackle impact with 61 takeover score.
#5
Middle Tennessee
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 57.4 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2021 Regular Season · UTEP
22.5 primary output · 32 efficiency · 17.4 usage
41.1
#2
2018 Regular Season · UTEP
35.8
0 primary · 6.3 efficiency · 1.2 usage
#3
2020 Regular Season · UTEP
28.6
20.5 primary · 27.5 efficiency · 8.7 usage
4
Impact games
7
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2018 · Rating 0.7681
Taylor · Katy, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
134
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 55 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Praise Amaewhule quick answers
Recruiting profile
2-star recruit