Usage Score
26.9
Player Dossier
2019-2022Wake Forest
A.T. Perry
WR • 6'5" • 205 lbs • Lake Worth, FL, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
A.T. Perry reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
82
Consistency
68
Season Value
67.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · Wake Forest
19192021212222
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Wake Forest
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Florida State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
A.T. Perry, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · Wake Forest. A.T. Perry reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason
Wake Forest paired 1,293 primary output with 88.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 82 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: NC State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Postseason · Wake Forest
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
84.3
Efficiency
82
Usage
26.9
Consistency
68
Best Game by takeover score
Missouri
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Missouri: 116. Unknown: 47. Vanderbilt: 142. Liberty: 33. Clemson: 51. Florida State: 91. Army: 118. Boston College: 42. Louisville: 28. NC State: 159. North Carolina: 63. Syracuse: 119. Duke: 87
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Missouri: 11 by 70.3. Unknown: 3 by 100. Vanderbilt: 5 by 100. Liberty: 4 by 55. Clemson: 4 by 85. Florida State: 8 by 75.8. Army: 5 by 100. Boston College: 3 by 93.3. Louisville: 3 by 62.2. NC State: 12 by 88.3. North Carolina: 5 by 84. Syracuse: 10 by 79.3. Duke: 8 by 72.5
Split Comparison
Wins94.4 · n=7 · +16.8 vs Losses
Losses77.6 · n=5 · -16.8 vs Wins
First Half85.4 · n=7 · +2.4 vs Second Half
Second Half83 · n=6 · -2.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
NC State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Army
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/23 | @ Missouri100 receiving yards · High volume | W 27-17 | — | 11 | 116 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 11/26 | @ DukeHigh volume | L 31-34 | — | 8 | 87 | 10.9 | 10.90 | 1 | 31 |
| Sun 11/20 | vs Syracuse100 receiving yards · High volume | W 45-35 | — | 10 | 119 | 11.9 | 11.90 | 3 | 29 |
| Sun 11/13 | vs North Carolina | L 34-36 | — | 5 | 63 | 12.6 | 12.60 | 1 | 32 |
| Sun 11/6 | @ NC State100 receiving yards · High volume | L 21-30 | — | 12 | 159 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 1 | 29 |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Louisville | L 21-48 | — | 3 | 28 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Boston College | W 43-15 | — | 3 | 42 | 14 | 14 | 1 | 17 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Army100 receiving yards | W 45-10 | — | 5 | 118 | 23.6 | 23.60 | 1 | 46 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Florida StateHigh volume | W 31-21 | — | 8 | 91 | 11.4 | 11.40 | 1 | 22 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Clemson | L 45-51 | — | 4 | 51 | 12.8 | 12.80 | 1 | 23 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Liberty | W 37-36 | — | 4 | 33 | 8.3 | 8.30 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Vanderbilt100 receiving yards | W 45-25 | — | 5 | 142 | 28.4 | 28.40 | 1 | 68 |
| Thu 9/1 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 47 | 15.7 | 15.70 | 0 | 33 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Wake Forest
2019-2022
Opening stop
Season Progression
2019201920202021202120222022
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Postseason | Wake Forest | 62 | 87.8 | 8.9 | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 62 | 87.8 | 8.9 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 211 | 75.6 | 14.3 | 149 |
| 2021 Postseason | Wake Forest | 1,293 | 88.2 | 23.3 | 1,082 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 1,293 | 88.2 | 23.3 | 0 |
| 2022 Postseason | Wake Forest | 1,096 | 82 | 26.9 | -197 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 1,096 | 82 | 26.9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Florida State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
155
Primary metric
155 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Unknown
81
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
81 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
NC State
159
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
159 receiving yards with a 88.3 efficiency score.
#4
Army
146
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
146 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Vanderbilt
142
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
142 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2021 Postseason · Wake Forest
1,293 primary output · 88.2 efficiency · 23.3 usage
70.9
#2
2021 Regular Season · Wake Forest
70.9
1,293 primary · 88.2 efficiency · 23.3 usage
#3
2022 Postseason · Wake Forest
67.4
1,096 primary · 82 efficiency · 26.9 usage
Milestones
12
100+ receiving yards
6
8+ catch outings
4
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2018 · Rating 0.8371
Park Vista Community · Lake Worth, FL
- Committed To
- Wake Forest
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2018
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
2,662
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 36 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.