Usage Score
9
Player Dossier
2019-2022Wake Forest
Blake Whiteheart
TE • 6'4" • 243 lbs • Winston-salem, NC, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Blake Whiteheart reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
71.2
Consistency
49.9
Season Value
57.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason · Wake Forest
192021212222
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Wake Forest
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Duke
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Blake Whiteheart, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason · Wake Forest. Blake Whiteheart reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason
Wake Forest paired 295 primary output with 71.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 71.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Duke
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Postseason · Wake Forest
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
26.8
Efficiency
71.2
Usage
9
Consistency
49.9
Best Game by takeover score
Missouri
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Missouri: 8. Unknown: 50. Vanderbilt: 14. Liberty: 20. Clemson: 31. Army: 7. Boston College: 34. Louisville: 52. NC State: 6. Syracuse: 13. Duke: 60
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Missouri: 1 by 53.3. Unknown: 2 by 100. Vanderbilt: 1 by 93.3. Liberty: 3 by 44.4. Clemson: 2 by 100. Army: 1 by 46.7. Boston College: 3 by 75.6. Louisville: 4 by 86.7. NC State: 1 by 40. Syracuse: 2 by 43.3. Duke: 4 by 100
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins16 · Games = 6 · -21.3 vs Losses
Losses37.3 · Games = 4 · +21.3 vs Wins
First Half21.7 · Games = 6 · -11.3 vs Second Half
Second Half33 · Games = 5 · +11.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Duke
Best efficiency game
100 vs Duke
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/23 | @ Missouri | W 27-17 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 11/26 | @ Duke | L 31-34 | — | 4 | 60 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 30 |
| Sun 11/20 | vs Syracuse | W 45-35 | — | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 0 | 7 |
| Sun 11/6 | @ NC State | L 21-30 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Louisville | L 21-48 | — | 4 | 52 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Boston College | W 43-15 | — | 3 | 34 | 11.3 | 11.30 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Army | W 45-10 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Clemson | L 45-51 | — | 2 | 31 | 15.5 | 15.50 | 1 | 19 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Liberty | W 37-36 | — | 3 | 20 | 6.7 | 6.70 | 1 | 9 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Vanderbilt | W 45-25 | — | 1 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
| Thu 9/1 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 50 | 25 | 25 | 1 | 27 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Wake Forest
2019-2022
Opening stop
Season Progression
201920202021202120222022
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 61 | 63.3 | 6.5 | 61 |
| 2021 Postseason | Wake Forest | 185 | 78.8 | 7.6 | 124 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 185 | 78.8 | 7.6 | 0 |
| 2022 Postseason | Wake Forest | 295 | 71.2 | 9 | 110 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 295 | 71.2 | 9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Duke
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
60
Primary metric
60 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Louisville
38
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
38 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Rutgers
35
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
35 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Virginia
32
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
32 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Unknown
50
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
50 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2022 Postseason · Wake Forest
295 primary output · 71.2 efficiency · 9 usage
57.5
#2
2022 Regular Season · Wake Forest
57.5
295 primary · 71.2 efficiency · 9 usage
#3
2021 Postseason · Wake Forest
54.9
185 primary · 78.8 efficiency · 7.6 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2018 · Rating 0.8302
Mount Tabor · Winston Salem, NC
- Committed To
- Wake Forest
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2018
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
541
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 25 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.