Usage Score
4
Player Dossier
2018-2021Wyoming
Chad Muma
LB • 6'3" • 227 lbs • Lone Tree, CO, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Chad Muma shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 53.3 disruption score.
Efficiency
21.9
Consistency
11.1
Season Value
10.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Wyoming
1819202121
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Wyoming
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UNLV
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Chad Muma, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Wyoming. Chad Muma shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 53.3 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
Wyoming paired 0 primary output with 4.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 21.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Loss with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Regular Season · Wyoming
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
0.4
Efficiency
21.9
Usage
4
Consistency
11.1
Best Game by takeover score
Air Force
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Missouri: 0. Texas State: 1. Unknown: 0. Tulsa: 2.5. UNLV: 0. San Diego State: 1. New Mexico: 0.5. Nevada: 0. Boise State: 0. Utah State: 0. Colorado State: 0. Air Force: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Missouri: 10 by 41.7. Texas State: 2 by 18.3. Unknown: 4 by 16.7. Tulsa: 7 by 54.2. UNLV: 5 by 20.8. San Diego State: 3 by 22.5. New Mexico: 5 by 25.8. Nevada: 3 by 12.5. Boise State: 1 by 4.2. Utah State: 2 by 8.3. Colorado State: 1 by 4.2. Air Force: 8 by 33.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0.3 · Games = 6 · -0.4 vs Losses
Losses0.7 · Games = 5 · +0.4 vs Wins
First Half0.8 · Games = 6 · +0.7 vs Second Half
Second Half0.1 · Games = 6 · -0.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Tulsa
Best efficiency game
54.2 vs Tulsa
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/30 | @ Air Force | L 6-20 | 8 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/23 | vs Colorado State | W 17-7 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/16 | @ Utah State | L 21-26 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/10 | @ Boise State | L 17-20 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Nevada | W 31-3 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | vs New Mexico | W 23-10 | 5 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/13 | @ San Diego State | L 22-26 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 9/29 | vs UNLV | W 53-17 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/21 | @ Tulsa | L 21-24 | 7 | 4 | — | 1.50 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Unknown | — | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Texas State | W 23-14 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Missouri10+ tackles | W 37-31 | 10 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Wyoming
2018-2021
Opening stop
Season Progression
20182019202020212021
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Wyoming | 0 | 4.2 | 1 | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | Wyoming | 5 | 21.9 | 4 | 5 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Wyoming | 12 | 61.3 | 16.7 | 7 |
| 2021 Postseason | Wyoming | 13.5 | 53.3 | 15.9 | 1.5 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Wyoming | 13.5 | 53.3 | 15.9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UNLV
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
6.5
Primary metric
6.5 disruption/tackle impact with 73.9 takeover score.
#2
Unknown
3
Primary metric
Game with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 70.1 takeover score.
#3
Ball State
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 65.4 takeover score.
#4
Tulsa
2.5
Primary metric
Loss with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 54.9 takeover score.
#5
San José State
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 52.3 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Regular Season · Wyoming
0 primary output · 4.2 efficiency · 1 usage
35.1
#2
2021 Postseason · Wyoming
32.3
13.5 primary · 53.3 efficiency · 15.9 usage
#3
2021 Regular Season · Wyoming
32.3
13.5 primary · 53.3 efficiency · 15.9 usage
Milestones
3
Impact games
6
Splash games
17
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2018 · Rating 0.8104
Legend · Parker, CO
- Committed To
- Wyoming
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2018
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
266
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 33 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.