Usage Score
18.6
Player Dossier
2018-2023Utah State
QB • 6'2" • 218 lbs • La Grande, OR, USA
Andrew Peasley is a balanced quarterback profile with 25.9 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage Score
18.6
Efficiency
53.1
Consistency
76.7
Season Value
58.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · Wyoming
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Andrew Peasley, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · Wyoming. Andrew Peasley is a balanced quarterback profile with 25.9 usage in the latest tracked season.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason
Wyoming paired 2,410 primary output with 63.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 53.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Utah State, Wyoming.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Win with 301 yards of offense and 70.7 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Primary Metric / G
159.4
Efficiency
53.1
Usage
18.6
Consistency
76.7
Best Game by takeover score
Ohio
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ohio: 195. Tulsa: 301. Illinois: 106. Unknown: 132. Air Force: 198. BYU: 163. San José State: 159. New Mexico: 180. Utah State: 228. Hawai'i: 147. Colorado State: -5. Fresno State: 109
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ohio: 41 by 51.6. Tulsa: 40 by 70.7. Illinois: 28 by 53.1. Unknown: 33 by 50.8. Air Force: 28 by 72.9. BYU: 32 by 54.3. San José State: 27 by 61.4. New Mexico: 26 by 57.2. Utah State: 32 by 65.5. Hawai'i: 29 by 46.6. Colorado State: 7 by 14.6. Fresno State: 33 by 39
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Tulsa
Best efficiency game
72.9 vs Air Force
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/30 | vs Ohio | L 27-30 | 18 | 30 | 186 | 60.0 | 1 | 1 | 51.6 | 11 | 9 | 0.80 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 11/26 | @ Fresno State | L 0-30 | 12 | 29 | 104 | 41.4 | 0 | 2 | 39 | 4 | 5 | 1.30 | 0 | 6 |
| Sun 11/13 | @ Colorado State | W 14-13 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 50.0 | 0 | 1 | 14.6 | 3 | -9 | -3 | 0 | 4 |
| Sun 10/30 | @ Hawai'iDual-threat | W 27-20 | 7 | 15 | 76 | 46.7 | 0 | 2 | 46.6 | 14 | 71 | 5.10 | 2 | 35 |
| Sun 10/23 | vs Utah State | W 28-14 | 13 | 26 | 199 | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | 65.5 | 6 | 29 | 4.80 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ New Mexico | W 27-14 | 10 | 21 | 174 | 47.6 | 2 | 0 | 57.2 | 5 | 6 | 1.20 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs San José StateDual-threat | L 16-33 | 6 | 20 | 85 | 30.0 | 2 | 1 | 61.4 | 7 | 74 | 10.60 | 0 | 61 |
| Sun 9/25 | @ BYU | L 24-38 | 14 | 27 | 154 | 51.9 | 2 | 0 | 54.3 | 5 | 9 | 1.80 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Air Force | W 17-14 | 18 | 23 | 162 | 78.3 | 1 | 1 | 72.9 | 5 | 36 | 7.20 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Unknown | — | 19 | 30 | 144 | 63.3 | 0 | 0 | 50.8 | 3 | -12 | -4 | 0 | 2 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Tulsa | W 40-37 | 20 | 30 | 256 | 66.7 | 2 | 0 | 70.7 | 10 | 45 | 4.50 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 8/27 | @ IllinoisDual-threat | L 6-38 | 5 | 20 | 30 | 25.0 | 0 | 1 | 53.1 | 8 | 76 | 9.50 | 0 | 37 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Utah State
2018-2021
Opening stop
Wyoming
2022-2023
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Utah State | 95 | 43.1 | 5.6 | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | Utah State | 88 | 80.2 | 7.1 | -7 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Utah State | 586 | 52.6 | 14 | 498 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Utah State | 576 | 55.2 | 7.5 | -10 |
| 2022 Postseason | Wyoming | 1,913 | 53.1 | 18.6 | 1,337 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Wyoming | 1,913 | 53.1 | 18.6 | 0 |
| 2023 Postseason | Wyoming | 2,410 | 63.3 | 25.9 | 497 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Wyoming | 2,410 | 63.3 | 25.9 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
New Mexico
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
357
Primary metric
357 total offense with 90.4 efficiency.
#2
Tulsa
301
Primary metric
Win with 301 yards of offense and 70.7 efficiency.
301 total offense with 70.7 efficiency.
#3
Air Force
224
Primary metric
Win with 224 yards of offense and 81.2 efficiency.
224 total offense with 81.2 efficiency.
#4
Hawai'i
322
Primary metric
Win with 322 yards of offense and 71.7 efficiency.
322 total offense with 71.7 efficiency.
#5
Nevada
261
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
261 total offense with 85.8 efficiency.
#1 Season by value score
2023 Postseason · Wyoming
2,410 primary output · 63.3 efficiency · 25.9 usage
67.6
#2
2023 Regular Season · Wyoming
67.6
2,410 primary · 63.3 efficiency · 25.9 usage
#3
2022 Postseason · Wyoming
58.3
1,913 primary · 53.1 efficiency · 18.6 usage
5
250+ passing yards
3
300+ total offense
1
3+ takeover TD games
20
Above avg efficiency
Recruit Profile
Class 2018 · Rating 0.7832
La Grande · La Grande, OR
Career Facts
2
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
5,668
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 42 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Andrew Peasley quick answers
Recruiting profile
2-star recruit