Usage Score
6.8
Player Dossier
2018-2022Rutgers
Artur Sitkowski
QB • 6'5" • 225 lbs • Old Bridge, NJ, USA
Balanced quarterback profileVolume operator
Artur Sitkowski is a balanced quarterback profile with 5.8 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
36.9
Consistency
28.1
Season Value
42.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · Illinois
1819202122
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Rutgers • Illinois
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UTSA
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Artur Sitkowski, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · Illinois. Artur Sitkowski is a balanced quarterback profile with 5.8 usage in the latest tracked season.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season
Illinois paired 735 primary output with 52.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 36.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2022 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Rutgers, Illinois.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Wisconsin
Loss with 270 yards of offense and 59.3 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Regular Season · Rutgers
Games
11
Primary Metric / G
99.2
Efficiency
36.9
Usage
6.8
Consistency
28.1
Best Game by takeover score
Penn State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas State: 196. Ohio State: 20. Kansas: 47. Buffalo: 42. Indiana: 146. Illinois: 266. Maryland: 1. Northwestern: 76. Wisconsin: 270. Michigan: 40. Penn State: -13
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas State: 31 by 46.6. Ohio State: 20 by 32.2. Kansas: 19 by 31.4. Buffalo: 15 by 46.5. Indiana: 37 by 44.2. Illinois: 49 by 46.3. Maryland: 17 by 4.2. Northwestern: 34 by 42.5. Wisconsin: 42 by 59.3. Michigan: 19 by 36.2. Penn State: 10 by 16.1
Split Comparison
Losses89.5 · n=10
First Half119.5 · n=6 · +44.7 vs Second Half
Second Half74.8 · n=5 · -44.7 vs First Half
All Games99.2 · n=11
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Wisconsin
Best efficiency game
59.3 vs Wisconsin
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/17 | vs Penn State | L 7-20 | 3 | 7 | 18 | 42.9 | 0 | 2 | 16.1 | 3 | -31 | -10.30 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 11/10 | vs Michigan | L 7-42 | 7 | 18 | 39 | 38.9 | 0 | 1 | 36.2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Sat 11/3 | @ Wisconsin | L 17-31 | 20 | 39 | 261 | 51.3 | 1 | 0 | 59.3 | 3 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 10/20 | vs Northwestern | L 15-18 | 15 | 31 | 81 | 48.4 | 0 | 0 | 42.5 | 3 | -5 | -1.70 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/13 | @ Maryland | L 7-34 | 2 | 16 | 8 | 12.5 | 0 | 4 | 4.2 | 1 | -7 | -7 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Illinois | L 17-38 | 29 | 46 | 267 | 63.0 | 1 | 3 | 46.3 | 3 | -1 | -0.30 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Indiana | L 17-24 | 18 | 35 | 154 | 51.4 | 1 | 1 | 44.2 | 2 | -8 | -4 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Buffalo | L 13-42 | 6 | 13 | 39 | 46.2 | 0 | 0 | 46.5 | 2 | 3 | 1.50 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/15 | @ Kansas | L 14-55 | 7 | 19 | 47 | 36.8 | 0 | 3 | 31.4 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/8 | @ Ohio State | L 3-52 | 6 | 18 | 38 | 33.3 | 0 | 1 | 32.2 | 2 | -18 | -9 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Texas State | W 35-7 | 20 | 29 | 205 | 69.0 | 1 | 3 | 46.6 | 2 | -9 | -4.50 | 0 | 2 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Rutgers
2018-2020
Opening stop
- 2
Illinois
2021-2022
Final stop
Season Progression
20182019202020212022
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Rutgers | 1,091 | 36.9 | 6.8 | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | Rutgers | 422 | 48 | 10.2 | -669 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Rutgers | 435 | 55.6 | 8.8 | 13 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Illinois | 735 | 52.2 | 16.1 | 300 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Illinois | 121 | 65.2 | 5.8 | -614 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UTSA
Loss with 299 yards of offense and 65 efficiency.
299
Primary metric
299 total offense with 65 efficiency.
#2
Wisconsin
270
Primary metric
Loss with 270 yards of offense and 59.3 efficiency.
270 total offense with 59.3 efficiency.
#3
Wyoming
23
Primary metric
Win with 23 yards of offense and 88 efficiency.
23 total offense with 88 efficiency.
#4
Boston College
304
Primary metric
Loss with 304 yards of offense and 58.6 efficiency.
304 total offense with 58.6 efficiency.
#5
Iowa
89
Primary metric
Win with 89 yards of offense and 54.3 efficiency.
89 total offense with 54.3 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2021 Regular Season · Illinois
735 primary output · 52.2 efficiency · 16.1 usage
48.7
#2
2020 Regular Season · Rutgers
46.8
435 primary · 55.6 efficiency · 8.8 usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · Rutgers
42.8
1,091 primary · 36.9 efficiency · 6.8 usage
Milestones
4
250+ passing yards
1
300+ total offense
0
3+ takeover TD games
4
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2018 · Rating 0.8881
IMG Academy · Old Bridge, NJ
- Committed To
- Rutgers
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2018
Career Facts
2
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
2,804
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 26 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.