Usage Score
14.2
Player Dossier
2018-2021San Diego State
BJ Busbee
WR • 5'7" • 149 lbs • Long Beach, CA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
BJ Busbee reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
68.4
Consistency
59.3
Season Value
60.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · San Diego State
181919202121
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- San Diego State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UTSA
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
BJ Busbee, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · San Diego State. BJ Busbee reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason
San Diego State paired 272 primary output with 68.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 68.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTSA
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2021 Postseason · San Diego State
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
24.7
Efficiency
68.4
Usage
14.2
Consistency
59.3
Best Game by takeover score
UTSA
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UTSA: 51. New Mexico State: 19. Arizona: 4. Unknown: 15. New Mexico: 36. San José State: 41. Air Force: 3. Fresno State: 11. UNLV: 21. Boise State: 37. Utah State: 34
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UTSA: 3 by 100. New Mexico State: 2 by 63.3. Arizona: 1 by 26.7. Unknown: 2 by 50. New Mexico: 1 by 100. San José State: 3 by 91.1. Air Force: 1 by 20. Fresno State: 1 by 73.3. UNLV: 2 by 70. Boise State: 3 by 82.2. Utah State: 3 by 75.6
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins26.5 · Games = 8 · +4 vs Losses
Losses22.5 · Games = 2 · -4 vs Wins
First Half27.7 · Games = 6 · +6.5 vs Second Half
Second Half21.2 · Games = 5 · -6.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UTSA
Best efficiency game
100 vs UTSA
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/22 | vs UTSA | W 38-24 | — | 3 | 51 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 31 |
| Sat 12/4 | vs Utah State | L 13-46 | — | 3 | 34 | 11.3 | 11.30 | 0 | 13 |
| Fri 11/26 | vs Boise State | W 27-16 | — | 3 | 37 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/20 | @ UNLV | W 28-20 | — | 2 | 21 | 7.3 | 10.50 | 0 | 12 |
| Sun 10/31 | vs Fresno State | L 20-30 | — | 1 | 11 | 7 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/23 | @ Air Force | W 20-14 | — | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 10/16 | @ San José State | W 19-13 | — | 3 | 41 | 9.6 | 13.70 | 0 | 16 |
| Sun 10/10 | vs New Mexico | W 31-7 | — | 1 | 36 | 36 | 36 | 0 | 36 |
| Sat 9/25 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 12 |
| Sun 9/12 | @ Arizona | W 38-14 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sun 9/5 | vs New Mexico State | W 28-10 | — | 2 | 19 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 0 | 25 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
San Diego State
2018-2021
Opening stop
Season Progression
201820192019202020212021
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | San Diego State | 136 | 82.2 | 9.7 | — |
| 2019 Postseason | San Diego State | 109 | 54.6 | 8.9 | -27 |
| 2019 Regular Season | San Diego State | 109 | 54.6 | 8.9 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | San Diego State | 40 | 42.5 | 11.2 | -69 |
| 2021 Postseason | San Diego State | 272 | 68.4 | 14.2 | 232 |
| 2021 Regular Season | San Diego State | 272 | 68.4 | 14.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UTSA
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
51
Primary metric
51 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Central Michigan
39
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
39 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Nevada
44
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
44 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Eastern Michigan
39
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
39 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Nevada
24
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
24 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2021 Postseason · San Diego State
272 primary output · 68.4 efficiency · 14.2 usage
60.5
#2
2021 Regular Season · San Diego State
60.5
272 primary · 68.4 efficiency · 14.2 usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · San Diego State
47.2
136 primary · 82.2 efficiency · 9.7 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
557
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 34 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.