Usage Score
20.8
Player Dossier
2018-2021Ohio State
WR • 6'1" • 188 lbs • San Marcos, CA, USA
Chris Olave reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
20.8
Efficiency
88.5
Consistency
69.8
Season Value
67
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason · Ohio State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Chris Olave, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason · Ohio State. Chris Olave reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason
Ohio State paired 729 primary output with 88.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 88.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Rutgers
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
65.3
Efficiency
88.5
Usage
20.8
Consistency
69.8
Best Game by takeover score
Clemson
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Clemson: 50. Florida Atlantic: 68. Cincinnati: 60. Indiana: 70. Miami (OH): 30. Nebraska: 30. Northwestern: 60. Wisconsin: 93. Maryland: 43. Rutgers: 139. Penn State: 44. Michigan: 68. Wisconsin: 94
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Clemson: 3 by 100. Florida Atlantic: 5 by 90.7. Cincinnati: 2 by 100. Indiana: 3 by 100. Miami (OH): 3 by 66.7. Nebraska: 3 by 66.7. Northwestern: 5 by 80. Wisconsin: 7 by 88.6. Maryland: 5 by 57.3. Rutgers: 4 by 100. Penn State: 2 by 100. Michigan: 2 by 100. Wisconsin: 5 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Rutgers
Best efficiency game
100 vs Clemson
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/29 | vs Clemson | L 23-29 | — | 3 | 50 | 16.7 | 16.70 | 1 | 23 |
| Sun 12/8 | @ Wisconsin | W 34-21 | — | 5 | 94 | 18.8 | 18.80 | 0 | 50 |
| Sat 11/30 | @ Michigan | W 56-27 | — | 2 | 68 | 34 | 34 | 1 | 57 |
| Sat 11/23 | vs Penn State | W 28-17 | — | 2 | 44 | 22 | 22 | 1 | 28 |
| Sat 11/16 | @ Rutgers100 receiving yards | W 56-21 | — | 4 | 139 | 34.8 | 34.80 | 0 | 58 |
| Sat 11/9 | vs Maryland | W 73-14 | — | 5 | 43 | 7.8 | 8.60 | 1 | 15 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Wisconsin2+ TD | W 38-7 | — | 7 | 93 | 11.8 | 13.30 | 2 | 27 |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Northwestern2+ TD | W 52-3 | — | 5 | 60 | 12 | 12 | 2 | 20 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Nebraska | W 48-7 | — | 3 | 30 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Miami (OH)2+ TD | W 76-5 | — | 3 | 30 | 10 | 10 | 2 | 13 |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Indiana | W 51-10 | — | 3 | 70 | 23.3 | 23.30 | 1 | 37 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Cincinnati | W 42-0 | — | 2 | 60 | 30 | 30 | 0 | 39 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Florida Atlantic | W 45-21 | — | 5 | 68 | 13.6 | 13.60 | 1 | 29 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Ohio State
2018-2021
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Ohio State | 197 | 82.2 | 7.3 | — |
| 2019 Postseason | Ohio State | 849 | 88.5 | 20.8 | 652 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Ohio State | 849 | 88.5 | 20.8 | 0 |
| 2020 Postseason | Ohio State | 729 | 88.5 | 36.2 | -120 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Ohio State | 729 | 88.5 | 36.2 | 0 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Ohio State | 936 | 81.2 | 21.8 | 207 |
#1 Featured game
Michigan State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
139
Primary metric
139 receiving yards with a 92.7 efficiency score.
#2
Clemson
132
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
132 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Michigan State
140
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
140 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Rutgers
139
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
139 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Minnesota
117
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
117 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2020 Postseason · Ohio State
729 primary output · 88.5 efficiency · 36.2 usage
70.7
#2
2020 Regular Season · Ohio State
70.7
729 primary · 88.5 efficiency · 36.2 usage
#3
2021 Regular Season · Ohio State
68.1
936 primary · 81.2 efficiency · 21.8 usage
11
100+ receiving yards
5
8+ catch outings
11
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2018 · Rating 0.8875
Mission Hills · San Marcos, CA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
2,711
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 38 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Chris Olave quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit