Usage Score
5.3
Player Dossier
2018-2022Notre Dame
Bo Bauer
LB • 6'2" • 235 lbs • Harborcreek, PA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Bo Bauer shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 8.5 disruption score.
Efficiency
24.3
Consistency
33.4
Season Value
22.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Notre Dame
1819192020212122
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Notre Dame
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Virginia
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Bo Bauer, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Notre Dame. Bo Bauer shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 8.5 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
Notre Dame paired 0 primary output with 8.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 24.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2022 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Virginia
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2021 Postseason · Notre Dame
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.9
Efficiency
24.3
Usage
5.3
Consistency
33.4
Best Game by takeover score
Oklahoma State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma State: 0. Florida State: 0. Toledo: 1. Purdue: 0. Wisconsin: 1. Cincinnati: 0.5. Virginia Tech: 0. USC: 3. North Carolina: 1. Navy: 0. Virginia: 4. Georgia Tech: 1.5. Stanford: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma State: 2 by 8.3. Florida State: 1 by 4.2. Toledo: 4 by 26.7. Purdue: 5 by 20.8. Wisconsin: 0 by 10. Cincinnati: 2 by 13.3. Virginia Tech: 2 by 8.3. USC: 7 by 59.2. North Carolina: 2 by 18.3. Navy: 3 by 12.5. Virginia: 9 by 77.5. Georgia Tech: 9 by 52.5. Stanford: 1 by 4.2
Split Comparison
Wins1.0 · n=11 · +0.8 vs Losses
Losses0.3 · n=2 · -0.8 vs Wins
First Half0.4 · n=7 · -1.2 vs Second Half
Second Half1.6 · n=6 · +1.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Virginia
Best efficiency game
77.5 vs Virginia
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/1 | vs Oklahoma State | L 35-37 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/28 | @ Stanford | W 45-14 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/20 | vs Georgia Tech | W 55-0 | 9 | 5 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/14 | @ Virginia | W 28-3 | 9 | 4 | — | 1.50 | 1.50 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/6 | vs Navy | W 34-6 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/30 | vs North Carolina | W 44-34 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/23 | vs USCSplash game | W 31-16 | 7 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/9 | @ Virginia Tech | W 32-29 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/2 | vs Cincinnati | L 13-24 | 2 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/25 | @ Wisconsin | W 41-13 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/18 | vs Purdue | W 27-13 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/11 | vs Toledo | W 32-29 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 9/5 | @ Florida State | W 41-38 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Notre Dame
2018-2022
Opening stop
Season Progression
20182019201920202020202120212022
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 0 | 8.4 | 1.2 | — |
| 2019 Postseason | Notre Dame | 2 | 12.4 | 2.8 | 2 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 2 | 12.4 | 2.8 | 0 |
| 2020 Postseason | Notre Dame | 7.5 | 15.3 | 5.1 | 5.5 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 7.5 | 15.3 | 5.1 | 0 |
| 2021 Postseason | Notre Dame | 12 | 24.3 | 5.3 | 4.5 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 12 | 24.3 | 5.3 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 0.5 | 8.5 | 2.2 | -11.5 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Virginia
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 64.7 takeover score.
#2
Florida State
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 54.3 takeover score.
#3
USC
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 51.1 takeover score.
#4
New Mexico
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 45 takeover score.
#5
Bowling Green
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 44.9 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Regular Season · Notre Dame
0 primary output · 8.4 efficiency · 1.2 usage
36.5
#2
2021 Postseason · Notre Dame
22.3
12 primary · 24.3 efficiency · 5.3 usage
#3
2021 Regular Season · Notre Dame
22.3
12 primary · 24.3 efficiency · 5.3 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
3
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2018 · Rating 0.9015
Cathedral Prep · Erie, PA
- Committed To
- Notre Dame
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2018
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
120
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 46 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.