Usage Score
10.3
Player Profile
Thomas Pannunzio
WR • 5'8" • 180 lbs • Pueblo, CO, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Thomas Pannunzio reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
42.9
Consistency
29.3
Season Value
39.2
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Colorado State
181920212223
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Primary stop by seasons
- Colorado State
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Colorado State
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Toledo
Thomas Pannunzio, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Colorado State. Thomas Pannunzio reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
Colorado State paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 42.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2023 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Colorado State, Central Michigan.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Toledo
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2023 Regular Season · Central Michigan
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
11
Efficiency
42.9
Usage
10.3
Consistency
29.3
Best Game by takeover score
Toledo
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. South Alabama: 6. Eastern Michigan: 0. Buffalo: 11. Akron: 7. Ball State: 5. Northern Illinois: 0. Western Michigan: 20. Ohio: -10. Toledo: 60
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. South Alabama: 1 by 40. Buffalo: 2 by 36.7. Akron: 2 by 23.3. Ball State: 1 by 33.3. Western Michigan: 2 by 66.7. Ohio: 1 by 0. Toledo: 3 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins3.3 · n=4 · -13.9 vs Losses
Losses17.2 · n=5 · +13.9 vs Wins
First Half5.8 · n=5 · -11.7 vs Second Half
Second Half17.5 · n=4 · +11.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Toledo
Best efficiency game
100 vs Toledo
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/24 | vs Toledo | L 17-32 | — | 3 | 60 | 20 | 20 | 1 | 49 |
| Thu 11/16 | @ Ohio | L 20-34 | — | 1 | -10 | -10 | -10 | 0 | -10 |
| Wed 11/8 | @ Western Michigan | L 28-38 | — | 2 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 13 |
| Tue 10/31 | vs Northern Illinois | W 37-31 | — | — | — | 1 | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | @ Ball State | L 17-24 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 10/14 | vs Akron | W 17-10 | — | 2 | 7 | 3.5 | 3.50 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 10/7 | @ Buffalo | L 13-37 | — | 2 | 11 | 5.5 | 5.50 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/30 | vs Eastern Michigan | W 26-23 | — | — | — | 14.5 | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | @ South Alabama | W 34-30 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Colorado State
2018-2022
Opening stop
- 2
Central Michigan
2023
Final stop
Season Progression
201820192020202120222023
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Colorado State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | Colorado State | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Colorado State | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Colorado State | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Colorado State | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 99 | 42.9 | 10.3 | 99 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Toledo
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
60
Primary metric
60 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Western Michigan
20
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
20 receiving yards with a 66.7 efficiency score.
#3
Buffalo
11
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
11 receiving yards with a 36.7 efficiency score.
#4
South Alabama
6
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
6 receiving yards with a 40 efficiency score.
#5
Ball State
5
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
5 receiving yards with a 33.3 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Regular Season · Colorado State
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2019 Regular Season · Colorado State
100
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2022 Regular Season · Colorado State
100
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
99
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 31 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.