Usage Score
27
Player Dossier
2019-2023Washington
Austin Osborne
WR • 6'2" • 205 lbs • Rancho Santa Margarita, CA, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Austin Osborne reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
59.2
Consistency
75
Season Value
65.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · Bowling Green
192021222323
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Washington • Bowling Green
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Buffalo
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Austin Osborne, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · Bowling Green. Austin Osborne reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season
Bowling Green paired 546 primary output with 59.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 59.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Washington, Bowling Green.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ohio
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2021 Regular Season · Bowling Green
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
45.5
Efficiency
59.2
Usage
27
Consistency
75
Best Game by takeover score
Ohio
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Tennessee: 46. South Alabama: 38. Unknown: 69. Minnesota: 28. Kent State: 52. Akron: 35. Northern Illinois: 63. Eastern Michigan: 42. Buffalo: 20. Toledo: 50. Miami (OH): 24. Ohio: 79
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Tennessee: 8 by 38.3. South Alabama: 7 by 36.2. Unknown: 6 by 76.7. Minnesota: 4 by 46.7. Kent State: 6 by 57.8. Akron: 5 by 46.7. Northern Illinois: 5 by 84. Eastern Michigan: 5 by 56. Buffalo: 2 by 66.7. Toledo: 6 by 55.6. Miami (OH): 2 by 80. Ohio: 8 by 65.8
Split Comparison
Wins42.3 · n=3 · -1.4 vs Losses
Losses43.8 · n=8 · +1.4 vs Wins
First Half44.7 · n=6 · -1.7 vs Second Half
Second Half46.3 · n=6 · +1.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Ohio
Best efficiency game
84 vs Northern Illinois
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/26 | vs OhioHigh volume | W 21-10 | — | 8 | 79 | 9.9 | 9.90 | 1 | 19 |
| Wed 11/17 | @ Miami (OH) | L 7-34 | — | 2 | 24 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 20 |
| Thu 11/11 | vs Toledo | L 17-49 | — | 6 | 50 | 8.3 | 8.30 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/30 | @ Buffalo | W 56-44 | — | 2 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/23 | vs Eastern Michigan | L 24-55 | — | 5 | 42 | 8.4 | 8.40 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 10/16 | @ Northern Illinois | L 26-34 | — | 5 | 63 | 12.6 | 12.60 | 1 | 36 |
| Sat 10/9 | vs Akron | L 20-35 | — | 5 | 35 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/2 | @ Kent State | L 20-27 | — | 6 | 52 | 8.7 | 8.70 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 9/25 | @ Minnesota | W 14-10 | — | 4 | 28 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/18 | vs Unknown | — | — | 6 | 69 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 0 | 33 |
| Sat 9/11 | vs South Alabama | L 19-22 | — | 7 | 38 | 5.4 | 5.40 | 0 | 26 |
| Fri 9/3 | @ TennesseeHigh volume | L 6-38 | — | 8 | 46 | 5.8 | 5.80 | 0 | 24 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Washington
2019-2020
Opening stop
- 2
Bowling Green
2021-2023
Final stop
Season Progression
201920202021202220232023
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | Washington | -2 | 0 | 5.3 | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | Washington | 0 | — | — | 2 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 546 | 59.2 | 27 | 546 |
| 2022 Postseason | Bowling Green | 19 | 63.3 | 12.5 | -527 |
| 2023 Postseason | Bowling Green | 302 | 58.6 | 15.3 | 283 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 302 | 58.6 | 15.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Buffalo
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
59
Primary metric
59 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Unknown
56
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
56 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#3
Ohio
79
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
79 receiving yards with a 65.8 efficiency score.
#4
Northern Illinois
63
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
63 receiving yards with a 84 efficiency score.
#5
Unknown
69
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
69 receiving yards with a 76.7 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2021 Regular Season · Bowling Green
546 primary output · 59.2 efficiency · 27 usage
65.1
#2
2022 Postseason · Bowling Green
44.8
19 primary · 63.3 efficiency · 12.5 usage
#3
2023 Postseason · Bowling Green
44.6
302 primary · 58.6 efficiency · 15.3 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2018 · Rating 0.918
Mission Viejo · Mission Viejo, CA
- Committed To
- Washington
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2018
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
865
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 26 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.