Usage Score
19.1
Player Dossier
2015-2019Utah
Siaosi Mariner
WR • 6'2" • 195 lbs • Tustin, CA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Siaosi Mariner reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
93.3
Consistency
73.2
Season Value
71.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Utah State
15161718181919
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Utah • Utah State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Wyoming
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Siaosi Mariner, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Utah State. Siaosi Mariner reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
Utah State paired 987 primary output with 93.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 93.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Utah, Utah State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Wyoming
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Postseason · Utah State
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
75.9
Efficiency
93.3
Usage
19.1
Consistency
73.2
Best Game by takeover score
Kent State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Kent State: 113. Wake Forest: 118. Unknown: 73. San Diego State: 74. Colorado State: 40. LSU: 45. Nevada: 53. Air Force: 38. BYU: 86. Fresno State: 103. Wyoming: 123. Boise State: 66. New Mexico: 55
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Kent State: 7 by 100. Wake Forest: 8 by 98.3. Unknown: 5 by 97.3. San Diego State: 7 by 70.5. Colorado State: 2 by 100. LSU: 2 by 100. Nevada: 2 by 100. Air Force: 3 by 84.4. BYU: 5 by 100. Fresno State: 11 by 62.4. Wyoming: 4 by 100. Boise State: 4 by 100. New Mexico: 3 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins74.7 · n=6 · -3 vs Losses
Losses77.7 · n=6 · +3 vs Wins
First Half73.7 · n=7 · -4.8 vs Second Half
Second Half78.5 · n=6 · +4.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Wyoming
Best efficiency game
100 vs Kent State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/21 | @ Kent State100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | L 41-51 | — | 7 | 113 | 16.1 | 16.10 | 2 | 25 |
| Sat 11/30 | @ New Mexico | W 38-25 | — | 3 | 55 | 18.3 | 18.30 | 1 | 35 |
| Sun 11/24 | vs Boise State | L 21-56 | — | 4 | 66 | 16.5 | 16.50 | 0 | 37 |
| Sat 11/16 | vs Wyoming100 receiving yards | W 26-21 | — | 4 | 123 | 30.8 | 30.80 | 1 | 80 |
| Sun 11/10 | @ Fresno State100 receiving yards · High volume | W 37-35 | — | 11 | 103 | 9.4 | 9.40 | 2 | 16 |
| Sun 11/3 | vs BYU | L 14-42 | — | 5 | 86 | 17.2 | 17.20 | 1 | 32 |
| Sun 10/27 | @ Air Force | L 7-31 | — | 3 | 38 | 12.7 | 12.70 | 1 | 27 |
| Sun 10/20 | vs Nevada | W 36-10 | — | 2 | 53 | 26.5 | 26.50 | 0 | 48 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ LSU | L 6-42 | — | 2 | 45 | 22.5 | 22.50 | 0 | 35 |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Colorado State | W 34-24 | — | 2 | 40 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 34 |
| Sun 9/22 | @ San Diego State | W 23-17 | — | 7 | 74 | 10.6 | 10.60 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Unknown | — | — | 5 | 73 | 14.6 | 14.60 | 1 | 29 |
| Sat 8/31 | @ Wake Forest100 receiving yards · High volume | L 35-38 | — | 8 | 118 | 14.8 | 14.80 | 1 | 28 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Utah
2015-2018
Opening stop
- 2
Utah State
2019
Final stop
Season Progression
2015201620172018201820192019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Utah | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Utah | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Utah | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Utah | 209 | 77.8 | 11.7 | 209 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Utah | 209 | 77.8 | 11.7 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Utah State | 987 | 93.3 | 19.1 | 778 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Utah State | 987 | 93.3 | 19.1 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Wyoming
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
123
Primary metric
123 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Wake Forest
118
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
118 receiving yards with a 98.3 efficiency score.
#3
Kent State
113
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
113 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Unknown
73
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
73 receiving yards with a 81.1 efficiency score.
#5
BYU
86
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
86 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Postseason · Utah State
987 primary output · 93.3 efficiency · 19.1 usage
71.4
#2
2019 Regular Season · Utah State
71.4
987 primary · 93.3 efficiency · 19.1 usage
#3
2018 Postseason · Utah
38.8
209 primary · 77.8 efficiency · 11.7 usage
Milestones
4
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2022 · Rating 0.8
Killian · Miami, FL
- Committed To
- Florida International
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2022
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,196
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 20 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.