Usage / Role
8%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2018-2021Utah
TE • 6'4" • 245 lbs • San Clemente, CA, USA
Cole Fotheringham reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage / Role
8%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
20
Developing production for a tight end
Reliability
18
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
37
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2019 Postseason · Utah
Snapshot
Player Story
Cole Fotheringham built his college career from 2018 through 2021 as a tight end from San Clemente, CA wearing No. 89, spending time with Utah. The clearest part of Cole Fotheringham's career was his receiving role:...
Read the storyCole Fotheringham, TE. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2019 Postseason · Utah. Cole Fotheringham reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Utah | 12 | 17 | 190 | 2 | 53.7 |
| 2019 Postseason | Utah | 9 | 3 | 30 | 0 | 64.9 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Utah | 9 | 13 | 126 | 1 | 64.9 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Utah | 4 | 4 | 52 | 0 | 53 |
| 2021 Postseason | Utah | 8 | 2 | 19 | 0 | 51.9 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Utah | 8 | 13 | 109 | 0 | 51.9 |
Related Context
Cole Fotheringham played TE for Utah. Across 4 tracked seasons, Cole Fotheringham recorded 526 receiving yards, 1 tackles, and 3 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2018 with Utah.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
Utah paired 156 primary output with 67.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 57.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Oregon
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
15.8
Efficiency
57.6
Usage
9.1
Consistency
26.9
Best Game by takeover score
Oregon
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Weber State: 3. Northern Illinois: 8. Washington: 5. Washington State: 2. Stanford: 13. USC: 5. UCLA: 7. Arizona State: 0. Oregon: 76. Colorado: 37. BYU: 10. Washington: 24
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Weber State: 1 by 20. Northern Illinois: 1 by 53.3. Washington: 1 by 33.3. Washington State: 1 by 13.3. Stanford: 1 by 86.7. USC: 1 by 33.3. UCLA: 1 by 46.7. Oregon: 5 by 100. Colorado: 2 by 100. BYU: 1 by 66.7. Washington: 2 by 80
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Oregon
Best efficiency game
100 vs Colorado
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/1 | @ Washington | L 3-10 | — | 2 | 24 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 13 |
| Sun 11/25 | vs BYU | W 35-27 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 11/17 | @ Colorado | W 30-7 | — | 2 | 37 | 18.5 | 18.50 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 11/10 | vs Oregon | W 32-25 | — | 5 | 76 | 15.2 | 15.20 | 0 | 40 |
| Sat 11/3 | @ Arizona State | L 20-38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/27 | @ UCLA | W 41-10 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 7 |
| Sun 10/21 | vs USC | W 41-28 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sun 10/7 | @ Stanford | W 40-21 | — | 1 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/29 | @ Washington State | L 24-28 | — | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Sun 9/16 | vs Washington | L 7-21 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/8 | @ Northern Illinois | W 17-6 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Fri 8/31 | vs Weber State | W 41-10 | — | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 |
Player Story
Cole Fotheringham built his college career from 2018 through 2021 as a tight end from San Clemente, CA wearing No. 89, spending time with Utah. The clearest part of Cole Fotheringham's career was his receiving role: 52 catches, 526 receiving yards, and 3 touchdowns across 33 career games in the available record. His career also includes 1 tackle, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. That gives Cole Fotheringham's career enough real context without stretching the story beyond the available production.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Utah
2018-2021
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Utah | 190 | 57.6 | 9.1 | — |
| 2019 Postseason | Utah | 156 | 67.9 | 10.8 | -34 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Utah | 156 | 67.9 | 10.8 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Utah | 52 | 85 | 5.1 | -104 |
| 2021 Postseason | Utah | 128 | 56.5 | 10.5 | 76 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Utah | 128 | 56.5 | 10.5 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
vs Oregon
Week 11 · W 32-25 · Conference game
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
76
Receiving Yards
95.9 takeover
76 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
vs Washington State
Week 4 · W 24-13 · Conference game
33
Receiving Yards
83.4 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
33 receiving yards with a 73.3 efficiency score.
#3
@ Texas
Week 1 · L 10-38 · Postseason
30
Receiving Yards
77.8 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
30 receiving yards with a 66.7 efficiency score.
#4
@ Colorado
Week 15 · W 38-21 · Conference game
16
Receiving Yards
72.2 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
16 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
vs USC
Week 12 · L 17-33 · Conference game
15
Receiving Yards
70.5 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
15 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2019 Postseason · Utah
156 primary output · 67.9 efficiency · 10.8 usage
64.9
#2
2019 Regular Season · Utah
64.9
156 primary · 67.9 efficiency · 10.8 usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · Utah
53.7
190 primary · 57.6 efficiency · 9.1 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.