Usage Score
13.7
Player Dossier
2019-2023Temple
Layton Jordan
LB • 6'2" • 220 lbs • Mckeesport, PA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Layton Jordan shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 14.5 disruption score.
Efficiency
41.3
Consistency
36.9
Season Value
36.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Temple
1920212223
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Temple
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Cincinnati
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Layton Jordan, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Temple. Layton Jordan shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 14.5 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season
Temple paired 2 primary output with 36.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 41.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2023 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Cincinnati
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Regular Season · Temple
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
2.5
Efficiency
41.3
Usage
13.7
Consistency
36.9
Best Game by takeover score
East Carolina
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Duke: 2.5. Unknown: 5. Rutgers: 4. Massachusetts: 1. Memphis: 1. UCF: 1. Tulsa: 6. Navy: 2. South Florida: 0. Houston: 1. Cincinnati: 7. East Carolina: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Duke: 8 by 58.3. Unknown: 5 by 70.8. Rutgers: 6 by 65. Massachusetts: 0 by 10. Memphis: 3 by 22.5. UCF: 5 by 30.8. Tulsa: 6 by 75. Navy: 5 by 40.8. South Florida: 4 by 16.7. Houston: 3 by 22.5. Cincinnati: 6 by 75. East Carolina: 2 by 8.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0.5 · Games = 2 · -2.2 vs Losses
Losses2.7 · Games = 9 · +2.2 vs Wins
First Half2.4 · Games = 6 · -0.3 vs Second Half
Second Half2.7 · Games = 6 · +0.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Cincinnati
Best efficiency game
75 vs Cincinnati
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/26 | vs East Carolina | L 46-49 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Cincinnati2+ sacks · Splash game | L 3-23 | 6 | 4 | — | 3.50 | 2.50 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Houston | L 36-43 | 3 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | vs South Florida | W 54-28 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/29 | @ NavySplash game | L 20-27 | 5 | 2 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 10/21 | vs Tulsa2+ sacks · Splash game | L 16-27 | 6 | 6 | — | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 10/13 | @ UCF | L 13-70 | 5 | 5 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Memphis | L 3-24 | 3 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Massachusetts | W 28-0 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Rutgers2+ sacks · Splash game | L 14-16 | 6 | 3 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Unknown2+ sacks · Splash game | — | 5 | 4 | — | 2.50 | 2.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 9/2 | @ DukeSplash game | L 0-30 | 8 | 4 | — | 2.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Temple
2019-2023
Opening stop
Season Progression
20192020202120222023
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | Temple | 2 | 36.7 | 15.7 | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | Temple | 0 | 4.2 | 0.8 | -2 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Temple | 6 | 15 | 5.6 | 6 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Temple | 30.5 | 41.3 | 13.7 | 24.5 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Temple | 6 | 14.5 | 4.6 | -24.5 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Cincinnati
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way.
7
Primary metric
7 disruption/tackle impact with 67.4 takeover score.
#2
Tulsa
6
Primary metric
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way.
6 disruption/tackle impact with 60.5 takeover score.
#3
Unknown
5
Primary metric
Game with backfield disruption leading the way.
5 disruption/tackle impact with 52.3 takeover score.
#4
UCF
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 50.8 takeover score.
#5
Navy
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 50.2 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Regular Season · Temple
2 primary output · 36.7 efficiency · 15.7 usage
39
#2
2022 Regular Season · Temple
36.1
30.5 primary · 41.3 efficiency · 13.7 usage
#3
2020 Regular Season · Temple
35
0 primary · 4.2 efficiency · 0.8 usage
Milestones
2
Impact games
7
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2018 · Rating 0.8043
McKeesport · Mckeesport, PA
- Committed To
- Temple
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2018
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
103
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 37 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.