Usage Score
12.9
Player Dossier
2018-2022Stanford
Brycen Tremayne
WR • 6'4" • 212 lbs • Los Angeles, CA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Brycen Tremayne reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
77.8
Consistency
39.3
Season Value
57.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season · Stanford
1819202122
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Stanford
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: BYU
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Brycen Tremayne, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season · Stanford. Brycen Tremayne reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season
Stanford paired 265 primary output with 95.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 77.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: BYU
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Regular Season · Stanford
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
40.8
Efficiency
77.8
Usage
12.9
Consistency
39.3
Best Game by takeover score
BYU
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 54. USC: 18. Washington: 4. Oregon: 20. Oregon State: 82. Notre Dame: 48. Arizona State: 60. UCLA: 30. Washington State: 16. Utah: 7. California: 21. BYU: 130
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 4 by 90. USC: 1 by 100. Washington: 1 by 26.7. Oregon: 2 by 66.7. Oregon State: 6 by 91.1. Notre Dame: 3 by 100. Arizona State: 5 by 80. UCLA: 1 by 100. Washington State: 2 by 53.3. Utah: 1 by 46.7. California: 1 by 100. BYU: 11 by 78.8
Split Comparison
Wins54 · n=2 · +17.6 vs Losses
Losses36.4 · n=9 · -17.6 vs Wins
First Half37.7 · n=6 · -6.3 vs Second Half
Second Half44 · n=6 · +6.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
BYU
Best efficiency game
100 vs California
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/27 | vs BYU100 receiving yards · High volume | L 26-35 | — | 11 | 130 | 11.8 | 11.80 | 1 | 36 |
| Sat 11/19 | @ California | L 20-27 | — | 1 | 21 | 21 | 21 | 0 | 21 |
| Sun 11/13 | @ Utah | L 7-42 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Washington State | L 14-52 | — | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 10 |
| Sun 10/30 | @ UCLA | L 13-38 | — | 1 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 0 | 30 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Arizona State | W 15-14 | — | 5 | 60 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Notre Dame | W 16-14 | — | 3 | 48 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 22 |
| Sun 10/9 | vs Oregon State2+ TD | L 27-28 | — | 6 | 82 | 13.7 | 13.70 | 2 | 37 |
| Sun 10/2 | @ Oregon | L 27-45 | — | 2 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 12 |
| Sun 9/25 | @ Washington | L 22-40 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs USC | L 28-41 | — | 1 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 18 |
| Sun 9/4 | vs Unknown | — | — | 4 | 54 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 0 | 30 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Stanford
2018-2022
Opening stop
Season Progression
20182019202020212022
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Stanford | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | Stanford | 22 | 48.9 | 4.1 | 22 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Stanford | 265 | 95.3 | 12.7 | 243 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Stanford | 245 | 81.6 | 20.3 | -20 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Stanford | 490 | 77.8 | 12.9 | 245 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
BYU
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
130
Primary metric
130 receiving yards with a 78.8 efficiency score.
#2
UCLA
88
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
88 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Kansas State
62
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
62 receiving yards with a 82.7 efficiency score.
#4
USC
49
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
49 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Arizona
14
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
14 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2020 Regular Season · Stanford
265 primary output · 95.3 efficiency · 12.7 usage
59.8
#2
2021 Regular Season · Stanford
59.4
245 primary · 81.6 efficiency · 20.3 usage
#3
2022 Regular Season · Stanford
57.1
490 primary · 77.8 efficiency · 12.9 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2025 · Rating 0.9115
Palatine · Palatine, IL
- Committed To
- Wisconsin
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2025
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
1,022
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 27 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.