Usage Score
12.2
Player Dossier
2018-2023Georgia Tech
Jordan Domineck
LB • 6'3" • 250 lbs • Lakeland, FL, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Jordan Domineck shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 33.6 disruption score.
Efficiency
33.6
Consistency
42.2
Season Value
31.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Georgia Tech
181920212223
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 3
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Georgia Tech • Arkansas • Colorado
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UCLA
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jordan Domineck, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Georgia Tech. Jordan Domineck shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 33.6 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
Georgia Tech paired 0 primary output with 10.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 33.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2023 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across Georgia Tech, Arkansas, Colorado.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UCLA
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2023 Regular Season · Colorado
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
1.6
Efficiency
33.6
Usage
12.2
Consistency
42.2
Best Game by takeover score
Utah
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. TCU: 0. Nebraska: 2.5. Colorado State: 3. Oregon: 2. USC: 1. Arizona State: 0. Stanford: 3. UCLA: 4. Oregon State: 1. Arizona: 1. Washington State: 1. Utah: 0.5
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. TCU: 4 by 16.7. Nebraska: 4 by 41.7. Colorado State: 4 by 46.7. Oregon: 3 by 32.5. USC: 6 by 35. Arizona State: 1 by 4.2. Stanford: 5 by 50.8. UCLA: 9 by 77.5. Oregon State: 2 by 18.3. Arizona: 1 by 14.2. Washington State: 6 by 35. Utah: 6 by 30
Split Comparison
Wins1.4 · n=4 · -0.3 vs Losses
Losses1.7 · n=8 · +0.3 vs Wins
First Half1.4 · n=6 · -0.3 vs Second Half
Second Half1.8 · n=6 · +0.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
UCLA
Best efficiency game
77.5 vs UCLA
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/25 | @ Utah | L 17-23 | 6 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/18 | @ Washington State | L 14-56 | 6 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/11 | vs Arizona | L 31-34 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/5 | vs Oregon State | L 19-26 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/28 | @ UCLA2+ sacks · Splash game | L 16-28 | 9 | 5 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | vs Stanford | L 43-46 | 5 | 5 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/7 | @ Arizona State | W 27-24 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/30 | vs USC | L 41-48 | 6 | 6 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Oregon | L 6-42 | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/17 | vs Colorado StateSplash game | W 43-35 | 4 | 3 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | vs NebraskaSplash game | W 36-14 | 4 | 3 | — | 2.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/2 | @ TCU | W 45-42 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Georgia Tech
2018-2021
Opening stop
- 2
Arkansas
2022
Peak year stop
- 3
Colorado
2023
Final stop
Season Progression
201820192020202120222023
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Georgia Tech | 0 | 10.5 | 1.9 | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | Georgia Tech | 5 | 25.7 | 9.4 | 5 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Georgia Tech | 13.5 | 31.2 | 10.9 | 8.5 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Georgia Tech | 10 | 23.5 | 7.3 | -3.5 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Arkansas | 13 | 21.6 | 6.2 | 3 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Colorado | 19 | 33.6 | 12.2 | 6 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UCLA
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 69.4 takeover score.
#2
Duke
4.5
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4.5 disruption/tackle impact with 62.6 takeover score.
#3
Unknown
4
Primary metric
Game with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 61.9 takeover score.
#4
Unknown
4
Primary metric
Game with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 60.5 takeover score.
#5
NC State
1.5
Primary metric
Win with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1.5 disruption/tackle impact with 50.2 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Regular Season · Georgia Tech
0 primary output · 10.5 efficiency · 1.9 usage
37.4
#2
2023 Regular Season · Colorado
31.1
19 primary · 33.6 efficiency · 12.2 usage
#3
2020 Regular Season · Georgia Tech
26
13.5 primary · 31.2 efficiency · 10.9 usage
Milestones
4
Impact games
7
Splash games
1
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2018 · Rating 0.8431
George W. Jenkins Senior · Lakeland, FL
- Committed To
- Georgia Tech
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2018
Career Facts
3
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
185
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 52 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.