Usage Score
3.7
Player Dossier
2018-2019Arizona State
A.J. Carter
RB • 6'0" • 218 lbs • Many, LA, USA
Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover
A.J. Carter leans balanced backfield option traits and 35.9 efficiency.
Efficiency
31.3
Consistency
94.4
Season Value
36.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Arizona State
18181919
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Arizona State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UTSA
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
A.J. Carter, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Arizona State. A.J. Carter leans balanced backfield option traits and 35.9 efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
Arizona State paired 75 primary output with 35.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 31.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTSA
Win with 7 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Postseason · Arizona State
Games
2
Scrimmage Yards / G
6
Efficiency
31.3
Usage
3.7
Consistency
94.4
Best Game by takeover score
Fresno State
Not enough games exist for the full explorer. The summary cards stay available so the season still reads clearly.
Game-by-Game Trend
12
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Fresno State: 5. UTSA: 7
Volume vs Efficiency
Scatter view is hidden because this season does not have enough game-to-game variety yet.
Split Comparison
All Games6 · n=2
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
2 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
UTSA
Best efficiency game
36.5 vs UTSA
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Arizona State
2018-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
2018201820192019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Postseason | Arizona State | 12 | 31.3 | 3.7 | — |
| 2018 Regular Season | Arizona State | 12 | 31.3 | 3.7 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Arizona State | 75 | 35.9 | 3.2 | 63 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Arizona State | 75 | 35.9 | 3.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UTSA
Win with 7 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
7
Primary metric
7 scrimmage yards and 3.8 usage.
#2
Kent State
18
Primary metric
Win with 18 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
18 scrimmage yards and 4.9 usage.
#3
Unknown
9
Primary metric
Game with 9 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
9 scrimmage yards and 1.8 usage.
#4
California
12
Primary metric
Win with 12 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
12 scrimmage yards and 4.8 usage.
#5
Florida State
12
Primary metric
Win with 12 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
12 scrimmage yards and 8.2 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Postseason · Arizona State
75 primary output · 35.9 efficiency · 3.2 usage
45.9
#2
2019 Regular Season · Arizona State
45.9
75 primary · 35.9 efficiency · 3.2 usage
#3
2018 Postseason · Arizona State
36.7
12 primary · 31.3 efficiency · 3.7 usage
Milestones
0
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2018 · Rating 0.8647
Many · Many, LA
- Committed To
- Arizona State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2018
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
87
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 14 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.