Usage Score
15
Player Dossier
2016-2019Memphis
Antonio Gibson
WR • 6'2" • 221 lbs • Stockbridge, GA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Antonio Gibson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
79.7
Consistency
50.5
Season Value
54.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Memphis
1617181919
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Memphis
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: SMU
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Antonio Gibson, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Memphis. Antonio Gibson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
Memphis paired 735 primary output with 79.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 79.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: SMU
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Postseason · Memphis
Games
14
Receiving Yards / G
52.5
Efficiency
79.7
Usage
15
Consistency
50.5
Best Game by takeover score
Penn State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Penn State: 99. Ole Miss: 0. Unknown: 55. South Alabama: 26. Navy: 105. UL Monroe: 50. Temple: 8. Tulane: 28. Tulsa: 79. SMU: 130. Houston: 93. South Florida: 22. Cincinnati: 8. Cincinnati: 32
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Penn State: 6 by 100. Unknown: 1 by 100. South Alabama: 2 by 86.7. Navy: 3 by 100. UL Monroe: 1 by 100. Temple: 1 by 53.3. Tulane: 3 by 62.2. Tulsa: 2 by 100. SMU: 6 by 100. Houston: 4 by 100. South Florida: 4 by 36.7. Cincinnati: 2 by 26.7. Cincinnati: 3 by 71.1
Split Comparison
Wins52.1 · n=11 · -1.4 vs Losses
Losses53.5 · n=2 · +1.4 vs Wins
First Half49 · n=7 · -7 vs Second Half
Second Half56 · n=7 · +7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
SMU
Best efficiency game
100 vs Penn State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/28 | @ Penn State | L 39-53 | — | 6 | 99 | 13.1 | 16.50 | 0 | 31 |
| Sat 12/7 | vs Cincinnati | W 29-24 | — | 3 | 32 | 11.6 | 10.70 | 1 | 14 |
| Fri 11/29 | vs Cincinnati | W 34-24 | — | 2 | 8 | 10.4 | 4 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 11/23 | @ South Florida | W 49-10 | — | 4 | 22 | 7.6 | 5.50 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 11/16 | @ Houston | W 45-27 | — | 4 | 93 | 16.7 | 23.30 | 1 | 56 |
| Sat 11/2 | vs SMU100 receiving yards | W 54-48 | — | 6 | 130 | 25.2 | 21.70 | 1 | 50 |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Tulsa | W 42-41 | — | 2 | 79 | 19.4 | 39.50 | 1 | 40 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Tulane | W 47-17 | — | 3 | 28 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Temple | L 28-30 | — | 1 | 8 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ UL Monroe | W 52-33 | — | 1 | 50 | 19.7 | 50 | 1 | 50 |
| Fri 9/27 | vs Navy100 receiving yards | W 35-23 | — | 3 | 105 | 35 | 35 | 1 | 73 |
| Sat 9/14 | @ South Alabama | W 42-6 | — | 2 | 26 | 13 | 13 | 1 | 22 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 55 | 55 | 55 | 1 | 55 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Ole Miss | W 15-10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Memphis
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
20162017201820192019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Memphis | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Memphis | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Memphis | 99 | 80 | 9.3 | 99 |
| 2019 Postseason | Memphis | 735 | 79.7 | 15 | 636 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Memphis | 735 | 79.7 | 15 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
SMU
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
130
Primary metric
130 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Unknown
68
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
68 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Navy
105
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
105 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Penn State
99
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
99 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Houston
93
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
93 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Postseason · Memphis
735 primary output · 79.7 efficiency · 15 usage
54.4
#2
2019 Regular Season · Memphis
54.4
735 primary · 79.7 efficiency · 15 usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · Memphis
32.7
99 primary · 80 efficiency · 9.3 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
834
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 19 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.