Usage Score
5.1
Player Dossier
2018-2022Oklahoma
S • 6'0" • 203 lbs • Tulsa, OK, USA
Patrick Fields shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 20.8 disruption score.
Usage Score
5.1
Efficiency
20.8
Consistency
12.1
Season Value
11.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Oklahoma
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Patrick Fields, S. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Oklahoma. Patrick Fields shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 20.8 disruption score.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Oklahoma paired 0 primary output with 13.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 20.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2022 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Oklahoma, Stanford.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: USC
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
0.5
Efficiency
20.8
Usage
5.1
Consistency
12.1
Best Game by takeover score
California
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 0. USC: 2. Washington: 0. Oregon: 1. Oregon State: 1. Notre Dame: 0. Arizona State: 0. UCLA: 1. Washington State: 0. Utah: 0. California: 0
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 3 by 12.5. USC: 7 by 49.2. Washington: 7 by 29.2. Oregon: 4 by 26.7. Oregon State: 5 by 30.8. Notre Dame: 5 by 20.8. Arizona State: 2 by 8.3. UCLA: 5 by 30.8. Washington State: 1 by 4.2. Utah: 3 by 12.5. California: 1 by 4.2
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
USC
Best efficiency game
49.2 vs USC
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/19 | @ California | L 20-27 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/13 | @ Utah | L 7-42 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Washington State | L 14-52 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/30 | @ UCLA | L 13-38 | 5 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Arizona State | W 15-14 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Notre Dame | W 16-14 | 5 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/9 | vs Oregon State | L 27-28 | 5 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/2 | @ Oregon | L 27-45 | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 9/25 | @ Washington | L 22-40 | 7 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | vs USC | L 28-41 | 7 | 6 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/4 | vs Unknown | — | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Oklahoma
2018-2021
Opening stop
Stanford
2022
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Postseason | Oklahoma | 0 | 13.5 | 2.3 | — |
| 2018 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 0 | 13.5 | 2.3 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Oklahoma | 13 | 28.3 | 6.8 | 13 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 13 | 28.3 | 6.8 | 0 |
| 2020 Postseason | Oklahoma | 6 | 27 | 5.2 | -7 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 6 | 27 | 5.2 | 0 |
| 2021 Postseason | Oklahoma | 8 | 34.4 | 7.8 | 2 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 8 | 34.4 | 7.8 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Stanford | 5 | 20.8 | 5.1 | -3 |
#1 Featured game
USC
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 55.8 takeover score.
#2
Iowa State
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 51.4 takeover score.
#3
Iowa State
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 50.3 takeover score.
#4
Kansas
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 50.1 takeover score.
#5
Texas Tech
1.5
Primary metric
Win with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1.5 disruption/tackle impact with 45.9 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · Oklahoma
0 primary output · 13.5 efficiency · 2.3 usage
38.6
#2
2018 Regular Season · Oklahoma
38.6
0 primary · 13.5 efficiency · 2.3 usage
#3
2019 Postseason · Oklahoma
26.4
13 primary · 28.3 efficiency · 6.8 usage
0
Impact games
2
Splash games
1
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2018 · Rating 0.866
Union · Tulsa, OK
Career Facts
2
Career teams
9
Seasons tracked
244
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 50 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Patrick Fields quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit