Usage Score
25.8
Player Dossier
2018-2022Middle Tennessee
Chase Cunningham
QB • 5'11" • 188 lbs • Knoxville, TN, USA
Balanced quarterback profileVolume operator
Chase Cunningham is a balanced quarterback profile with 25.8 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
58.2
Consistency
73.4
Season Value
64.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason · Middle Tennessee
181920212222
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Middle Tennessee
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Army
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Chase Cunningham, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason · Middle Tennessee. Chase Cunningham is a balanced quarterback profile with 25.8 usage in the latest tracked season.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason
Middle Tennessee paired 3,208 primary output with 58.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 58.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTSA
Loss with 386 yards of offense and 59.3 efficiency. It landed in the 83.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Postseason · Middle Tennessee
Games
12
Primary Metric / G
267.3
Efficiency
58.2
Usage
25.8
Consistency
73.4
Best Game by takeover score
San Diego State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. San Diego State: 145. James Madison: 91. Colorado State: 290. Unknown: 239. Miami: 437. UTSA: 386. UAB: 194. Western Kentucky: 257. UTEP: 252. Louisiana Tech: 148. Florida Atlantic: 458. Florida International: 311
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. San Diego State: 52 by 49.2. James Madison: 40 by 46.2. Colorado State: 51 by 61.5. Unknown: 30 by 70. Miami: 34 by 70.1. UTSA: 65 by 59.3. UAB: 51 by 47.3. Western Kentucky: 60 by 56.1. UTEP: 33 by 64.9. Louisiana Tech: 30 by 48.3. Florida Atlantic: 64 by 61.5. Florida International: 52 by 64.1
Split Comparison
Wins315.5 · n=6 · +100.3 vs Losses
Losses215.2 · n=5 · -100.3 vs Wins
First Half264.7 · n=6 · -5.3 vs Second Half
Second Half270 · n=6 · +5.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
UTSA
Best efficiency game
70.1 vs Miami
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/25 | @ San Diego State | W 25-23 | 26 | 43 | 236 | 60.5 | 2 | 1 | 49.2 | 9 | -91 | -10.10 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 11/26 | @ Florida International | W 33-28 | 29 | 42 | 279 | 69.0 | 0 | 0 | 64.1 | 10 | 32 | 3.20 | 2 | 16 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Florida Atlantic300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 49-21 | 40 | 54 | 448 | 74.1 | 5 | 1 | 61.5 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Louisiana Tech | L 24-40 | 15 | 27 | 136 | 55.6 | 1 | 3 | 48.3 | 3 | 12 | 4 | 1 | 9 |
| Sun 10/30 | @ UTEP3+ TD | W 24-13 | 21 | 27 | 265 | 77.8 | 3 | 0 | 64.9 | 6 | -13 | -2.20 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Western Kentucky | L 17-35 | 32 | 51 | 228 | 62.7 | 1 | 1 | 56.1 | 9 | 29 | 3.20 | 1 | 14 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ UAB | L 14-41 | 26 | 43 | 196 | 60.5 | 1 | 1 | 47.3 | 8 | -2 | -0.30 | 0 | 9 |
| Fri 9/30 | vs UTSA300-yard game | L 30-45 | 35 | 56 | 368 | 62.5 | 1 | 0 | 59.3 | 9 | 18 | 2 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Miami300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 45-31 | 16 | 25 | 408 | 64.0 | 3 | 1 | 70.1 | 9 | 29 | 3.20 | 1 | 12 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Unknown3+ TD | — | 20 | 24 | 216 | 83.3 | 2 | 1 | 70 | 6 | 23 | 3.80 | 1 | 18 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Colorado State | W 34-19 | 31 | 39 | 266 | 79.5 | 1 | 1 | 61.5 | 12 | 24 | 2 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/3 | @ James Madison | L 7-44 | 18 | 32 | 110 | 56.3 | 1 | 0 | 46.2 | 8 | -19 | -2.40 | 0 | 4 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Middle Tennessee
2018-2022
Opening stop
Season Progression
201820192020202120222022
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 0 | 16.7 | 2.6 | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 231 | 56.1 | 4.3 | 231 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 73 | 42.2 | 7.1 | -158 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 1,436 | 61.3 | 17.6 | 1,363 |
| 2022 Postseason | Middle Tennessee | 3,208 | 58.2 | 25.8 | 1,772 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 3,208 | 58.2 | 25.8 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Army
Loss with 63 yards of offense and 74.2 efficiency.
63
Primary metric
63 total offense with 74.2 efficiency.
#2
Charlotte
444
Primary metric
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
444 total offense with 80.3 efficiency.
#3
Old Dominion
59
Primary metric
Win with 59 yards of offense and 100 efficiency.
59 total offense with 100 efficiency.
#4
UTSA
386
Primary metric
Loss with 386 yards of offense and 59.3 efficiency.
386 total offense with 59.3 efficiency.
#5
Miami
437
Primary metric
Win with 437 yards of offense and 70.1 efficiency.
437 total offense with 70.1 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2022 Postseason · Middle Tennessee
3,208 primary output · 58.2 efficiency · 25.8 usage
64.4
#2
2022 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee
64.4
3,208 primary · 58.2 efficiency · 25.8 usage
#3
2021 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee
42.7
1,436 primary · 61.3 efficiency · 17.6 usage
Milestones
9
250+ passing yards
6
300+ total offense
3
3+ takeover TD games
14
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
4,948
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 29 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.