Usage Score
14.4
Player Dossier
2015-2018UTEP
WR • 6'1" • 175 lbs • USA
Erik Brown reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
14.4
Efficiency
78.9
Consistency
52.3
Season Value
60.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · UTEP
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Erik Brown, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · UTEP. Erik Brown reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
UTEP paired 201 primary output with 78.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 78.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2018 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Rice
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
7
Receiving Yards / G
28.7
Efficiency
78.9
Usage
14.4
Consistency
52.3
Best Game by takeover score
Southern Miss
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. North Texas: 0. Louisiana Tech: 23. UAB: 6. Rice: 60. Middle Tennessee: 10. Western Kentucky: 47. Southern Miss: 55
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Louisiana Tech: 1 by 100. UAB: 1 by 40. Rice: 3 by 100. Middle Tennessee: 2 by 33.3. Western Kentucky: 2 by 100. Southern Miss: 3 by 100
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
7 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Rice
Best efficiency game
100 vs Southern Miss
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UTEP
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | UTEP | 151 | 66.2 | 16.6 | 151 |
| 2018 Regular Season | UTEP | 201 | 78.9 | 14.4 | 50 |
#1 Featured game
UTSA
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
52
Primary metric
52 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Rice
60
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
60 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Southern Miss
55
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
55 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Western Kentucky
47
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
47 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Southern Miss
34
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
34 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2018 Regular Season · UTEP
201 primary output · 78.9 efficiency · 14.4 usage
60.7
#2
2017 Regular Season · UTEP
50.8
151 primary · 66.2 efficiency · 16.6 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · UTEP
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2014 · Rating 0.9336
Summit · Fontana, CA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
352
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 14 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Erik Brown quick answers
Recruiting profile
4-star recruit