Player Dossier

2015-2018

UTEP

Erik Brown

WR • 6'1" • 175 lbs • USA

Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher

Erik Brown reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Usage Score

14.4

Efficiency

78.9

Consistency

52.3

Season Value

60.7

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · UTEP

15161718

Snapshot

Career Teams
1
Seasons Tracked
4
Program Path
UTEP
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: UTSA

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Erik Brown, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · UTEP. Erik Brown reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season

UTEP paired 201 primary output with 78.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2018 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 78.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2018 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Rice

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2018 Regular Season · UTEP

Games

7

Receiving Yards / G

28.7

Efficiency

78.9

Usage

14.4

Consistency

52.3

Best Game by takeover score

Southern Miss

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Game-by-Game Trend

1234567

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. North Texas: 0. Louisiana Tech: 23. UAB: 6. Rice: 60. Middle Tennessee: 10. Western Kentucky: 47. Southern Miss: 55

Volume vs Efficiency

Low volume / high quality

High volume / high quality

Low volume / lower quality

High volume / lower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Louisiana Tech: 1 by 100. UAB: 1 by 40. Rice: 3 by 100. Middle Tennessee: 2 by 33.3. Western Kentucky: 2 by 100. Southern Miss: 3 by 100

Split Comparison

Losses23.5 · n=6
First Half22.3 · n=4 · -15.1 vs Second Half
Second Half37.3 · n=3 · +15.1 vs First Half
All Games28.7 · n=7

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

7 games

Featured metric

Receiving Yards

Top game by takeover score

Rice

Best efficiency game

100 vs Southern Miss

Result
Sat 11/24vs Southern MissL 7-3935518.318.30141
Sun 11/18@ Western KentuckyL 16-4024723.523.50043
Sat 11/10vs Middle TennesseeL 32-482105516
Sat 11/3@ RiceW 34-263602020037
Sat 10/27vs UABL 0-19166606
Sat 10/20@ Louisiana TechL 24-311232323023
Sat 10/6vs North TexasL 24-27

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    UTEP

    2015-2018

    Opening stop

Season Progression

2015201620172018
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2015 Regular SeasonUTEP0
2016 Regular SeasonUTEP00
2017 Regular SeasonUTEP15166.216.6151
2018 Regular SeasonUTEP20178.914.450

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

UTSA

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

52

Primary metric

52 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#2

Rice

60

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

60 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#3

Southern Miss

55

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

55 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#4

Western Kentucky

47

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

47 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#5

Southern Miss

34

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

34 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by value score

2018 Regular Season · UTEP

201 primary output · 78.9 efficiency · 14.4 usage

60.7

#2

2017 Regular Season · UTEP

50.8

151 primary · 66.2 efficiency · 16.6 usage

#3

2015 Regular Season · UTEP

0 primary · efficiency · usage

Milestones

0

100+ receiving yards

0

8+ catch outings

0

2+ TD games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit Profile

4★

Class 2014 · Rating 0.9336

Summit · Fontana, CA

Committed To
California
Commit Date
Jan 1, 2014

Career Facts

1

Career teams

4

Seasons tracked

352

Career Receiving Yards

Data Context

Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 14 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.

Quick Answers

Erik Brown quick answers

Recruiting profile

4-star recruit

Position
WR
Teams played for
1
Seasons tracked
4
Career receiving yards
352