Usage Score
11.8
Player Dossier
2017-2018UAB
LB • 6'3" • 235 lbs • Houston, TX, USA
Tre' Crawford shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 30.4 disruption score.
Usage Score
11.8
Efficiency
30.4
Consistency
45.9
Season Value
35.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · UAB
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tre' Crawford, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · UAB. Tre' Crawford shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 30.4 disruption score.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
UAB paired 0 primary output with 5.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 30.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Southern Miss
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
1.7
Efficiency
30.4
Usage
11.8
Consistency
45.9
Best Game by takeover score
Northern Illinois
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Northern Illinois: 0.5. Unknown: 1. Coastal Carolina: 0. Tulane: 0. Charlotte: 2. Louisiana Tech: 2. Rice: 3. UTSA: 0. Southern Miss: 6.5. Texas A&M: 0. Middle Tennessee: 3. Middle Tennessee: 2.5
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Northern Illinois: 4 by 21.7. Unknown: 3 by 22.5. Coastal Carolina: 2 by 8.3. Tulane: 1 by 4.2. Charlotte: 3 by 32.5. Louisiana Tech: 7 by 49.2. Rice: 3 by 42.5. UTSA: 1 by 4.2. Southern Miss: 4 by 66.7. Texas A&M: 4 by 16.7. Middle Tennessee: 5 by 50.8. Middle Tennessee: 5 by 45.8
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Southern Miss
Best efficiency game
66.7 vs Southern Miss
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/19 | @ Northern Illinois | W 37-13 | 4 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/1 | @ Middle Tennessee | W 27-25 | 5 | 4 | — | 1.50 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/24 | @ Middle TennesseeSplash game | L 3-27 | 5 | 4 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/18 | @ Texas A&M | L 20-41 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/11 | vs Southern Miss2+ sacks · Splash game | W 26-23 | 4 | 3 | — | 3.50 | 3 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/3 | vs UTSA | W 52-3 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/13 | @ RiceSplash game | W 42-0 | 3 | 3 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/6 | @ Louisiana Tech | W 28-7 | 7 | 6 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Charlotte | W 28-7 | 3 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Tulane | W 31-24 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/8 | @ Coastal Carolina | L 24-47 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 8/31 | vs Unknown | — | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UAB
2017-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Regular Season | UAB | 0 | 5.2 | 0.9 | — |
| 2018 Postseason | UAB | 20.5 | 30.4 | 11.8 | 20.5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | UAB | 20.5 | 30.4 | 11.8 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Southern Miss
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
6.5
Primary metric
6.5 disruption/tackle impact with 62.1 takeover score.
#2
Middle Tennessee
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 38.8 takeover score.
#3
Rice
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 34.7 takeover score.
#4
Middle Tennessee
2.5
Primary metric
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 33.6 takeover score.
#5
Louisiana Tech
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 30.8 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2017 Regular Season · UAB
0 primary output · 5.2 efficiency · 0.9 usage
35.4
#2
2018 Postseason · UAB
35.2
20.5 primary · 30.4 efficiency · 11.8 usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · UAB
35.2
20.5 primary · 30.4 efficiency · 11.8 usage
1
Impact games
3
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
47
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 16 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Tre' Crawford quick answers