Usage Score
22.2
Player Dossier
2018-2019UTEP
Tre'Shon Wolf
WR • 6'0" • 170 lbs • Victoria, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Tre'Shon Wolf reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
73.2
Consistency
57.3
Season Value
61.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · UTEP
1819
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 2
- Program Path
- UTEP
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Western Kentucky
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tre'Shon Wolf, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · UTEP. Tre'Shon Wolf reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season
UTEP paired 433 primary output with 73.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 73.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2019 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Regular Season · UTEP
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
39.4
Efficiency
73.2
Usage
22.2
Consistency
57.3
Best Game by takeover score
Rice
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 96. Texas Tech: 8. Nevada: 10. Southern Miss: 13. UTSA: 91. Florida International: 44. Louisiana Tech: 44. Charlotte: 16. UAB: 25. New Mexico State: 50. Rice: 36
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 2 by 100. Texas Tech: 3 by 17.8. Nevada: 1 by 66.7. Southern Miss: 1 by 86.7. UTSA: 9 by 67.4. Florida International: 4 by 73.3. Louisiana Tech: 4 by 73.3. Charlotte: 2 by 53.3. UAB: 1 by 100. New Mexico State: 5 by 66.7. Rice: 2 by 100
Split Comparison
Losses33.7 · n=10
First Half43.7 · n=6 · +9.5 vs Second Half
Second Half34.2 · n=5 · -9.5 vs First Half
All Games39.4 · n=11
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
100 vs Rice
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/30 | vs Rice | L 16-30 | — | 2 | 36 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 11/23 | @ New Mexico State | L 35-44 | — | 5 | 50 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 11/16 | @ UAB | L 10-37 | — | 1 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 11/9 | vs Charlotte | L 21-28 | — | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 9 |
| Sun 10/27 | vs Louisiana Tech | L 21-42 | — | 4 | 44 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Florida International | L 17-32 | — | 4 | 44 | 9 | 11 | 0 | 18 |
| Sun 10/6 | vs UTSAHigh volume | L 16-26 | — | 9 | 91 | 10.1 | 10.10 | 1 | 15 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Southern Miss | L 13-31 | — | 1 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
| Sun 9/22 | vs Nevada | L 21-37 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sun 9/8 | @ Texas Tech | L 3-38 | — | 3 | 8 | 2.5 | 2.70 | 0 | 7 |
| Sun 9/1 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 96 | 38 | 48 | 1 | 80 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTEP
2018-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
20182019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | UTEP | 144 | 71.7 | 12.5 | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | UTEP | 433 | 73.2 | 22.2 | 289 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Western Kentucky
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
63
Primary metric
63 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Unknown
96
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
96 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
UTSA
91
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
91 receiving yards with a 67.4 efficiency score.
#4
UTSA
38
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
38 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Florida International
44
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
44 receiving yards with a 73.3 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Regular Season · UTEP
433 primary output · 73.2 efficiency · 22.2 usage
61.7
#2
2018 Regular Season · UTEP
38.2
144 primary · 71.7 efficiency · 12.5 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
577
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 17 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.