Usage Score
14.4
Player Dossier
2016-2019UTEP
Alan Busey
WR • 6'1" • 195 lbs • Anchorage, AK, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Alan Busey reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
80.2
Consistency
60.8
Season Value
63.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · UTEP
16171819
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- UTEP
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Alan Busey, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · UTEP. Alan Busey reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season
UTEP paired 239 primary output with 80.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 80.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2019 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Regular Season · UTEP
Games
8
Receiving Yards / G
29.9
Efficiency
80.2
Usage
14.4
Consistency
60.8
Best Game by takeover score
New Mexico State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 57. Southern Miss: 51. Florida International: 11. Louisiana Tech: 35. North Texas: 20. Charlotte: 14. UAB: 31. New Mexico State: 20
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 2 by 100. Southern Miss: 3 by 100. Florida International: 2 by 36.7. Louisiana Tech: 3 by 77.8. North Texas: 2 by 66.7. Charlotte: 1 by 93.3. UAB: 2 by 100. New Mexico State: 2 by 66.7
Split Comparison
Losses26 · n=7
First Half38.5 · n=4 · +17.3 vs Second Half
Second Half21.3 · n=4 · -17.3 vs First Half
All Games29.9 · n=8
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
100 vs UAB
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/23 | @ New Mexico State | L 35-44 | — | 2 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 11/16 | @ UAB | L 10-37 | — | 2 | 31 | 15.5 | 15.50 | 1 | 23 |
| Sat 11/9 | vs Charlotte | L 21-28 | — | 1 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/2 | @ North Texas | L 26-52 | — | 2 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 12 |
| Sun 10/27 | vs Louisiana Tech | L 21-42 | — | 3 | 35 | 11.7 | 11.70 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Florida International | L 17-32 | — | 2 | 11 | 5.5 | 5.50 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Southern Miss | L 13-31 | — | 3 | 51 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 27 |
| Sun 9/1 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 57 | 28.5 | 28.50 | 0 | 32 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTEP
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
2016201720182019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | UTEP | 9 | 30 | 12.5 | 9 |
| 2018 Regular Season | UTEP | 50 | 82.2 | 9.6 | 41 |
| 2019 Regular Season | UTEP | 239 | 80.2 | 14.4 | 189 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
57
Primary metric
57 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Southern Miss
51
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
51 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Louisiana Tech
18
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
18 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
UTSA
20
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
20 receiving yards with a 66.7 efficiency score.
#5
UAB
31
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
31 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Regular Season · UTEP
239 primary output · 80.2 efficiency · 14.4 usage
63.6
#2
2018 Regular Season · UTEP
48.7
50 primary · 82.2 efficiency · 9.6 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · UTEP
36.6
9 primary · 30 efficiency · 12.5 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
298
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 12 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.