Usage Score
3.4
Player Dossier
2016-2020Rutgers
Everett Wormley
WR • 6'0" • 197 lbs • Burlington, NJ, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Everett Wormley reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
60
Consistency
50
Season Value
39.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Rutgers
1617181920
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Rutgers
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UConn
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Everett Wormley, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Rutgers. Everett Wormley reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
Rutgers paired 19 primary output with 33.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 60 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2020 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Illinois
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Regular Season · Rutgers
Games
2
Receiving Yards / G
4.5
Efficiency
60
Usage
3.4
Consistency
50
Best Game by takeover score
Maryland
Not enough games exist for the full explorer. The summary cards stay available so the season still reads clearly.
Game-by-Game Trend
12
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Illinois: 9. Maryland: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Scatter view is hidden because this season does not have enough game-to-game variety yet.
Split Comparison
Losses4.5 · n=2
All Games4.5 · n=2
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
2 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Illinois
Best efficiency game
60 vs Illinois
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Rutgers
2016-2020
Opening stop
Season Progression
20162017201820192020
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Rutgers | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Rutgers | 19 | 33.3 | 11.6 | 19 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Rutgers | 9 | 60 | 3.4 | -10 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Rutgers | 0 | — | — | -9 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Rutgers | 0 | — | — | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UConn
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
17
Primary metric
17 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Illinois
9
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
9 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
#3
Indiana
8
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
8 receiving yards with a 26.7 efficiency score.
#4
Michigan
6
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
6 receiving yards with a 40 efficiency score.
#5
Washington
5
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
5 receiving yards with a 33.3 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Regular Season · Rutgers
19 primary output · 33.3 efficiency · 11.6 usage
55.1
#2
2018 Regular Season · Rutgers
39.6
9 primary · 60 efficiency · 3.4 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Rutgers
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2017 · Rating 0.8161
Burlington Township · Burlington, NJ
- Committed To
- Rutgers
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2017
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
28
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 6 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.