Usage Score
24.2
Player Dossier
2018-2023UL Monroe
Perry Carter
WR • 5'10" • 175 lbs • Houston, TX, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Perry Carter reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
88.8
Consistency
67.5
Season Value
70.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · Jacksonville State
181920212323
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- UL Monroe • Jacksonville State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: New Mexico State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Perry Carter, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · Jacksonville State. Perry Carter reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason
Jacksonville State paired 687 primary output with 88.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 88.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across UL Monroe, Jacksonville State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: New Mexico State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2023 Postseason · Jacksonville State
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
62.5
Efficiency
88.8
Usage
24.2
Consistency
67.5
Best Game by takeover score
Louisiana
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Louisiana: 69. Unknown: 10. Coastal Carolina: 77. Eastern Michigan: 10. Sam Houston: 69. Middle Tennessee: 76. Liberty: 83. Western Kentucky: 27. South Carolina: 106. Louisiana Tech: 26. New Mexico State: 134
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Louisiana: 4 by 100. Unknown: 2 by 33.3. Coastal Carolina: 2 by 100. Eastern Michigan: 1 by 66.7. Sam Houston: 4 by 100. Middle Tennessee: 4 by 100. Liberty: 5 by 100. Western Kentucky: 2 by 90. South Carolina: 5 by 100. Louisiana Tech: 2 by 86.7. New Mexico State: 7 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins46.2 · n=6 · -53.8 vs Losses
Losses100 · n=4 · +53.8 vs Wins
First Half51.8 · n=6 · -23.4 vs Second Half
Second Half75.2 · n=5 · +23.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
New Mexico State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Louisiana
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/16 | @ Louisiana | W 34-31 | — | 4 | 69 | 15.8 | 17.30 | 1 | 33 |
| Sat 11/25 | @ New Mexico State100 receiving yards | L 17-20 | — | 7 | 134 | 17.5 | 19.10 | 0 | 38 |
| Sat 11/18 | vs Louisiana Tech | W 56-17 | — | 2 | 26 | 10.3 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 11/4 | @ South Carolina100 receiving yards | L 28-38 | — | 5 | 106 | 17.8 | 21.20 | 1 | 54 |
| Tue 10/17 | vs Western Kentucky | W 20-17 | — | 2 | 27 | 11.7 | 13.50 | 0 | 21 |
| Tue 10/10 | vs Liberty | L 13-31 | — | 5 | 83 | 16.6 | 16.60 | 0 | 25 |
| Thu 10/5 | @ Middle Tennessee | W 45-30 | — | 4 | 76 | 19 | 19 | 1 | 63 |
| Fri 9/29 | @ Sam Houston | W 35-28 | — | 4 | 69 | 17.3 | 17.30 | 1 | 28 |
| Sat 9/23 | vs Eastern Michigan | W 21-0 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/9 | @ Coastal Carolina | L 16-30 | — | 2 | 77 | 38.5 | 38.50 | 0 | 42 |
| Sat 9/2 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UL Monroe
2018-2021
Opening stop
- 2
Jacksonville State
2023
Final stop
Season Progression
201820192020202120232023
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | UL Monroe | 67 | 47.8 | 6.9 | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | UL Monroe | 305 | 68.2 | 7.4 | 238 |
| 2020 Regular Season | UL Monroe | 312 | 66.7 | 11.1 | 7 |
| 2021 Regular Season | UL Monroe | 0 | — | — | -312 |
| 2023 Postseason | Jacksonville State | 687 | 88.8 | 24.2 | 687 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Jacksonville State | 687 | 88.8 | 24.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
New Mexico State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
134
Primary metric
134 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
South Carolina
106
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
106 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Georgia State
124
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
124 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Georgia Southern
95
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
95 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Ole Miss
55
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
55 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2023 Postseason · Jacksonville State
687 primary output · 88.8 efficiency · 24.2 usage
70.1
#2
2023 Regular Season · Jacksonville State
70.1
687 primary · 88.8 efficiency · 24.2 usage
#3
2019 Regular Season · UL Monroe
39.4
305 primary · 68.2 efficiency · 7.4 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2017 · Rating 0.7719
St. Pius X · Houston, TX
- Committed To
- UL Monroe
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2017
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,371
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 34 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.