Usage Score
6
Player Dossier
2017-2021Toledo
TE • 6'4" • 240 lbs • Powell, OH, USA
Drew Rosi reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
6
Efficiency
75
Consistency
61.3
Season Value
49.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Toledo
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Drew Rosi, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Toledo. Drew Rosi reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season
Toledo paired 238 primary output with 77.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 75 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2021 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Northern Illinois
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
6
Receiving Yards / G
23
Efficiency
75
Usage
6
Consistency
61.3
Best Game by takeover score
Akron
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Notre Dame: 9. Colorado State: 17. Massachusetts: 7. Northern Illinois: 46. Eastern Michigan: 26. Akron: 33
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Notre Dame: 1 by 60. Colorado State: 2 by 56.7. Massachusetts: 1 by 46.7. Northern Illinois: 1 by 100. Eastern Michigan: 2 by 86.7. Akron: 1 by 100
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
6 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Northern Illinois
Best efficiency game
100 vs Akron
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Toledo
2017-2021
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Regular Season | Toledo | 90 | 86.7 | 6.1 | — |
| 2018 Postseason | Toledo | 120 | 75.2 | 8.1 | 30 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Toledo | 120 | 75.2 | 8.1 | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Toledo | 238 | 77.7 | 13.5 | 118 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Toledo | 62 | 46.4 | 7.8 | -176 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Toledo | 138 | 75 | 6 | 76 |
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
84
Primary metric
84 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Northern Illinois
46
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
46 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Northern Illinois
24
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
24 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Northern Illinois
40
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
40 receiving yards with a 88.9 efficiency score.
#5
Ball State
39
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
39 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2019 Regular Season · Toledo
238 primary output · 77.7 efficiency · 13.5 usage
57
#2
2017 Regular Season · Toledo
51.9
90 primary · 86.7 efficiency · 6.1 usage
#3
2021 Regular Season · Toledo
49.9
138 primary · 75 efficiency · 6 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2024 · Rating 0.8731
Reagan · Pfafftown, NC
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
648
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 33 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Drew Rosi quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit