Usage Score
25.6
Player Dossier
2016-2022UTEP
Ronald Awatt
RB • 6'0" • 213 lbs • Lubbock, TX, USA
Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover
Ronald Awatt leans balanced backfield option traits and 47.5 efficiency.
Efficiency
50.5
Consistency
59.8
Season Value
59
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · UTEP
1617181920212122
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- UTEP
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Rice
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Ronald Awatt, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · UTEP. Ronald Awatt leans balanced backfield option traits and 47.5 efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason
UTEP paired 1,002 primary output with 50.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 50.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Rice
Win with 184 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2021 Postseason · UTEP
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
77.1
Efficiency
50.5
Usage
25.6
Consistency
59.8
Best Game by takeover score
Fresno State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Fresno State: 86. Unknown: 147. New Mexico State: 74. Boise State: 44. New Mexico: 38. Old Dominion: 8. Southern Miss: 159. Louisiana Tech: 24. Florida Atlantic: 36. UTSA: 94. North Texas: 85. Rice: 184. UAB: 23
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Fresno State: 17 by 38.9. Unknown: 20 by 72.1. New Mexico State: 11 by 70.1. Boise State: 15 by 30.6. New Mexico: 13 by 29.9. Old Dominion: 3 by 27.8. Southern Miss: 18 by 86.8. Louisiana Tech: 8 by 31.3. Florida Atlantic: 12 by 31.8. UTSA: 17 by 55.5. North Texas: 17 by 52.1. Rice: 11 by 100. UAB: 7 by 29.9
Split Comparison
Wins81.2 · n=6 · +19.8 vs Losses
Losses61.3 · n=6 · -19.8 vs Wins
First Half79.4 · n=7 · +5.1 vs Second Half
Second Half74.3 · n=6 · -5.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Rice
Best efficiency game
100 vs Rice
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/18 | @ Fresno State | L 24-31 | 14 | 40 | 2.90 | 1 | 3 | 46 | 5.1 |
| Fri 11/26 | @ UAB | L 25-42 | 5 | 13 | 2.60 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 3.3 |
| Sat 11/20 | vs Rice100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 38-28 | 9 | 119 | 13.20 | 0 | 2 | 65 | 16.7 |
| Sat 11/13 | @ North Texas | L 17-20 | 17 | 85 | 5 | 1 | — | — | 5 |
| Sun 11/7 | vs UTSA | L 23-44 | 16 | 83 | 5.20 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 5.5 |
| Sat 10/30 | @ Florida Atlantic | L 25-28 | 11 | 34 | 3.10 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Sun 10/17 | vs Louisiana Tech | W 19-3 | 8 | 24 | 3 | 0 | — | — | 3 |
| Sat 10/9 | @ Southern Miss100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 26-13 | 18 | 159 | 8.80 | 1 | — | — | 8.8 |
| Sun 10/3 | vs Old Dominion | W 28-21 | 3 | 8 | 2.70 | 0 | — | — | 2.7 |
| Sun 9/26 | vs New Mexico | W 20-13 | 12 | 34 | 2.80 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2.9 |
| Sat 9/11 | @ Boise State | L 13-54 | 15 | 44 | 2.90 | 0 | — | — | 2.9 |
| Sun 9/5 | vs Unknown100 rush yards | — | 19 | 126 | 6.60 | 1 | 1 | 21 | 7.3 |
| Sun 8/29 | @ New Mexico State | W 30-3 | 11 | 74 | 6.70 | 1 | — | — | 6.7 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTEP
2016-2022
Opening stop
Season Progression
20162017201820192020202120212022
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | UTEP | 13 | 29.6 | 6.9 | 13 |
| 2018 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | 0 | -13 |
| 2019 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | UTEP | 190 | 46.9 | 12.5 | 190 |
| 2021 Postseason | UTEP | 1,002 | 50.5 | 25.6 | 812 |
| 2021 Regular Season | UTEP | 1,002 | 50.5 | 25.6 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | UTEP | 810 | 47.5 | 25.6 | -192 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Rice
Win with 184 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
184
Primary metric
184 scrimmage yards and 20 usage.
#2
Southern Miss
159
Primary metric
Win with 159 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
159 scrimmage yards and 39.1 usage.
#3
New Mexico State
130
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
130 scrimmage yards and 51.2 usage.
#4
Unknown
147
Primary metric
Game with 147 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
147 scrimmage yards and 30.8 usage.
#5
North Texas
79
Primary metric
Loss with 79 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
79 scrimmage yards and 21.2 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2021 Postseason · UTEP
1,002 primary output · 50.5 efficiency · 25.6 usage
59
#2
2021 Regular Season · UTEP
59
1,002 primary · 50.5 efficiency · 25.6 usage
#3
2022 Regular Season · UTEP
57.8
810 primary · 47.5 efficiency · 25.6 usage
Milestones
4
100+ rush yards
2
150+ scrimmage yards
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2016 · Rating 0.7578
Frenship · Wolfforth, TX
- Committed To
- UTEP
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2016
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
2,015
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 36 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.