Usage Score
8.5
Player Dossier
2015-2018UTEP
Jamar Smith
LB • 5'10" • 230 lbs • Lyons, GA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Jamar Smith shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 33.2 disruption score.
Efficiency
33.2
Consistency
11.1
Season Value
15.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · UTEP
15161718
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- UTEP
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Army
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jamar Smith, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · UTEP. Jamar Smith shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 33.2 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
UTEP paired 6.5 primary output with 33.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 33.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Rice
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Regular Season · UTEP
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
0.5
Efficiency
33.2
Usage
8.5
Consistency
11.1
Best Game by takeover score
Southern Miss
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 0.5. UNLV: 2. Tennessee: 0. New Mexico State: 0. UTSA: 0. North Texas: 0. Louisiana Tech: 0. UAB: 0. Rice: 2.5. Middle Tennessee: 0. Western Kentucky: 0. Southern Miss: 1.5
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 2 by 13.3. UNLV: 8 by 53.3. Tennessee: 7 by 29.2. New Mexico State: 6 by 25. UTSA: 6 by 25. North Texas: 11 by 45.8. Louisiana Tech: 2 by 8.3. UAB: 10 by 41.7. Rice: 4 by 41.7. Middle Tennessee: 8 by 33.3. Western Kentucky: 5 by 20.8. Southern Miss: 11 by 60.8
Split Comparison
Losses0.3 · n=10
First Half0.4 · n=6 · -0.2 vs Second Half
Second Half0.7 · n=6 · +0.2 vs First Half
All Games0.5 · n=12
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Rice
Best efficiency game
60.8 vs Southern Miss
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/24 | vs Southern Miss10+ tackles | L 7-39 | 11 | 5 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/18 | @ Western Kentucky | L 16-40 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/10 | vs Middle Tennessee | L 32-48 | 8 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/3 | @ Rice | W 34-26 | 4 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/27 | vs UAB10+ tackles | L 0-19 | 10 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/20 | @ Louisiana Tech | L 24-31 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/6 | vs North Texas10+ tackles | L 24-27 | 11 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/29 | @ UTSA | L 21-30 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/22 | vs New Mexico State | L 20-27 | 6 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/15 | @ Tennessee | L 0-24 | 7 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/9 | @ UNLV | L 24-52 | 8 | 6 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Unknown | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTEP
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
2015201620172018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | UTEP | 4 | 18.2 | 6.8 | 4 |
| 2018 Regular Season | UTEP | 6.5 | 33.2 | 8.5 | 2.5 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Army
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1
Primary metric
1 disruption/tackle impact with 54.7 takeover score.
#2
Rice
2.5
Primary metric
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 53.4 takeover score.
#3
UNLV
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 52 takeover score.
#4
UAB
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 45.1 takeover score.
#5
Southern Miss
1.5
Primary metric
Loss with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1.5 disruption/tackle impact with 45 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Regular Season · UTEP
6.5 primary output · 33.2 efficiency · 8.5 usage
15.2
#2
2017 Regular Season · UTEP
10.8
4 primary · 18.2 efficiency · 6.8 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · UTEP
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
3
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
114
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 22 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.