Usage Score
35.9
Player Dossier
2017-2020Rice
Austin Trammell
WR • 5'10" • 185 lbs • Spring, TX, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Austin Trammell reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
75.9
Consistency
69.8
Season Value
69.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Rice
17181920
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Rice
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Southern Miss
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Austin Trammell, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Rice. Austin Trammell reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season
Rice paired 726 primary output with 75.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 75.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2020 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 91.7th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Regular Season · Rice
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
60.5
Efficiency
75.9
Usage
35.9
Consistency
69.8
Best Game by takeover score
UTEP
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Army: 40. Wake Forest: 67. Texas: 97. Baylor: 27. Louisiana Tech: 53. UAB: 113. UTSA: 75. Southern Miss: 52. Marshall: 35. Middle Tennessee: 22. North Texas: 91. UTEP: 54
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Army: 4 by 66.7. Wake Forest: 6 by 74.4. Texas: 6 by 100. Baylor: 2 by 90. Louisiana Tech: 5 by 70.7. UAB: 5 by 100. UTSA: 9 by 55.6. Southern Miss: 5 by 69.3. Marshall: 4 by 58.3. Middle Tennessee: 3 by 48.9. North Texas: 7 by 86.7. UTEP: 4 by 90
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins55.7 · Games = 3 · -6.4 vs Losses
Losses62.1 · Games = 9 · +6.4 vs Wins
First Half66.2 · Games = 6 · +11.3 vs Second Half
Second Half54.8 · Games = 6 · -11.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Texas
Best efficiency game
100 vs UAB
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/30 | @ UTEP | W 30-16 | — | 4 | 54 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 1 | 24 |
| Sat 11/23 | vs North Texas | W 20-14 | — | 7 | 91 | 12.8 | 13 | 0 | 31 |
| Sat 11/16 | @ Middle Tennessee | W 31-28 | — | 3 | 22 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 11/2 | vs Marshall | L 7-20 | — | 4 | 35 | 8.8 | 8.80 | 1 | 18 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Southern Miss | L 6-20 | — | 5 | 52 | 10.4 | 10.40 | 1 | 15 |
| Sat 10/19 | @ UTSAHigh volume | L 27-31 | — | 9 | 75 | 8.3 | 8.30 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ UAB100 receiving yards | L 20-35 | — | 5 | 113 | 22.6 | 22.60 | 0 | 36 |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Louisiana Tech | L 20-23 | — | 5 | 53 | 10.6 | 10.60 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Baylor | L 13-21 | — | 2 | 27 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 0 | 15 |
| Sun 9/15 | vs Texas | L 13-48 | — | 6 | 97 | 16.2 | 16.20 | 0 | 45 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Wake Forest | L 21-41 | — | 6 | 67 | 9.9 | 11.20 | 1 | 19 |
| Fri 8/30 | @ Army | L 7-14 | — | 4 | 40 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 38 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Rice
2017-2020
Opening stop
Season Progression
2017201820192020
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Regular Season | Rice | 51 | 78.9 | 16 | — |
| 2018 Regular Season | Rice | 632 | 62.7 | 30.7 | 581 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Rice | 726 | 75.9 | 35.9 | 94 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Rice | 335 | 100 | 33.7 | -391 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Southern Miss
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
143
Primary metric
143 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
UTEP
112
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
112 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#3
Texas
97
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
97 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
UAB
113
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
113 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Old Dominion
27
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
27 receiving yards with a 90 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Regular Season · Rice
726 primary output · 75.9 efficiency · 35.9 usage
69.7
#2
2020 Regular Season · Rice
64.8
335 primary · 100 efficiency · 33.7 usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · Rice
58.5
632 primary · 62.7 efficiency · 30.7 usage
Milestones
4
100+ receiving yards
3
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2017 · Rating 0.7833
Klein · Spring, TX
- Committed To
- Rice
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2017
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
1,744
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 40 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.