Usage Score
34.8
Player Dossier
2017-2021Ball State
WR • 5'9" • 186 lbs • Douglasville, GA, USA
Justin Hall reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
34.8
Efficiency
67.2
Consistency
65.1
Season Value
64
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Ball State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Justin Hall, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Ball State. Justin Hall reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
Ball State paired 801 primary output with 67.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 67.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2021 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Buffalo
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 91.7th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
66.8
Efficiency
67.2
Usage
34.8
Consistency
65.1
Best Game by takeover score
Miami (OH)
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Illinois: 36. UAB: 94. Unknown: 82. Western Kentucky: 98. Western Michigan: 121. Akron: 48. Central Michigan: 11. Toledo: 39. Eastern Michigan: 76. Northern Illinois: 48. Buffalo: 102. Miami (OH): 46
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Illinois: 2 by 100. UAB: 8 by 78.3. Unknown: 7 by 78.1. Western Kentucky: 5 by 100. Western Michigan: 13 by 62.1. Akron: 7 by 45.7. Central Michigan: 4 by 18.3. Toledo: 7 by 37.1. Eastern Michigan: 4 by 100. Northern Illinois: 8 by 40. Buffalo: 8 by 85. Miami (OH): 5 by 61.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Buffalo
Best efficiency game
100 vs Eastern Michigan
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 11/22 | vs Miami (OH) | L 7-28 | — | 5 | 46 | 8.3 | 9.20 | 0 | 19 |
| Fri 11/17 | vs Buffalo100 receiving yards · High volume | L 24-40 | — | 8 | 102 | 11.6 | 12.80 | 1 | 47 |
| Fri 11/10 | @ Northern IllinoisHigh volume | L 17-63 | — | 8 | 48 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 12 |
| Thu 11/2 | @ Eastern Michigan | L 14-56 | — | 4 | 76 | 16.6 | 19 | 0 | 30 |
| Thu 10/26 | vs Toledo | L 17-58 | — | 7 | 39 | 8.8 | 5.60 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 10/21 | vs Central Michigan | L 9-56 | — | 4 | 11 | 2.8 | 2.80 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 10/7 | @ Akron | L 3-31 | — | 7 | 48 | 6.9 | 6.90 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/30 | @ Western Michigan100 receiving yards · High volume | L 3-55 | — | 13 | 121 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 0 | 37 |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Western Kentucky | L 21-33 | — | 5 | 98 | 19.6 | 19.60 | 0 | 30 |
| Sat 9/16 | vs Unknown | — | — | 7 | 82 | 9.1 | 11.70 | 1 | 21 |
| Sat 9/9 | vs UABHigh volume | W 51-31 | — | 8 | 94 | 8.9 | 11.80 | 1 | 25 |
| Sat 9/2 | @ Illinois | L 21-24 | — | 2 | 36 | 12.7 | 18 | 0 | 27 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Ball State
2017-2021
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Regular Season | Ball State | 801 | 67.2 | 34.8 | — |
| 2018 Regular Season | Ball State | 622 | 58.2 | 24 | -179 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Ball State | 684 | 69.5 | 27 | 62 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Ball State | 665 | 77 | 32.3 | -19 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Ball State | 613 | 62.4 | 28.4 | -52 |
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
137
Primary metric
137 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Western Michigan
175
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
175 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Western Michigan
117
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
117 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#4
Buffalo
102
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
102 receiving yards with a 85 efficiency score.
#5
Western Michigan
121
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
121 receiving yards with a 62.1 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2017 Regular Season · Ball State
801 primary output · 67.2 efficiency · 34.8 usage
64
#2
2020 Regular Season · Ball State
60.2
665 primary · 77 efficiency · 32.3 usage
#3
2019 Regular Season · Ball State
59.1
684 primary · 69.5 efficiency · 27 usage
8
100+ receiving yards
15
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2017 · Rating 0.8026
Alexander · Douglasville, GA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
3,385
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 54 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Justin Hall quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit