Usage Score
10.6
Player Dossier
2017-2021Ball State
Bryce Cosby
S • 5'10" • 181 lbs • Louisville, KY, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Bryce Cosby shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 49.6 disruption score.
Efficiency
45.6
Consistency
46.2
Season Value
28.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · Ball State
17181920202121
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Ball State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Penn State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Bryce Cosby, S. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · Ball State. Bryce Cosby shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 49.6 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason
Ball State paired 19.5 primary output with 49.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2020 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 45.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Central Michigan
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2020 Postseason · Ball State
Games
8
Havoc Plays / G
1.4
Efficiency
45.6
Usage
10.6
Consistency
46.2
Best Game by takeover score
San José State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. San José State: 1. Miami (OH): 0. Eastern Michigan: 1. Northern Illinois: 1. Toledo: 3. Central Michigan: 3. Western Michigan: 1.5. Buffalo: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. San José State: 9 by 47.5. Miami (OH): 1 by 4.2. Eastern Michigan: 8 by 43.3. Northern Illinois: 14 by 60. Toledo: 4 by 46.7. Central Michigan: 6 by 55. Western Michigan: 11 by 60.8. Buffalo: 9 by 47.5
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins1.6 · Games = 7
First Half0.8 · Games = 4 · -1.4 vs Second Half
Second Half2.1 · Games = 4 · +1.4 vs First Half
All Games1.4 · Games = 8
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Central Michigan
Best efficiency game
60.8 vs Western Michigan
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/31 | @ San José State | W 34-13 | 9 | 8 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/19 | @ Buffalo | W 38-28 | 9 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 12/12 | vs Western Michigan10+ tackles | W 30-27 | 11 | 5 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/5 | @ Central MichiganSplash game | W 45-20 | 6 | 6 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/28 | @ Toledo | W 27-24 | 4 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
| Thu 11/19 | vs Northern Illinois10+ tackles | W 31-25 | 14 | 9 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 11/12 | vs Eastern Michigan | W 38-31 | 8 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Thu 11/5 | @ Miami (OH) | L 31-38 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Ball State
2017-2021
Opening stop
Season Progression
2017201820192020202020212021
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Regular Season | Ball State | 6 | 25.8 | 5.4 | — |
| 2018 Regular Season | Ball State | 6.5 | 32.5 | 9.5 | 0.5 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Ball State | 9 | 34.6 | 8.2 | 2.5 |
| 2020 Postseason | Ball State | 11.5 | 45.6 | 10.6 | 2.5 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Ball State | 11.5 | 45.6 | 10.6 | 0 |
| 2021 Postseason | Ball State | 19.5 | 49.6 | 14.7 | 8 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Ball State | 19.5 | 49.6 | 14.7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Penn State
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 66.3 takeover score.
#2
Western Michigan
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 63.1 takeover score.
#3
Western Michigan
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 63.1 takeover score.
#4
Toledo
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 62.1 takeover score.
#5
NC State
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 61.3 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2021 Postseason · Ball State
19.5 primary output · 49.6 efficiency · 14.7 usage
32.9
#2
2021 Regular Season · Ball State
32.9
19.5 primary · 49.6 efficiency · 14.7 usage
#3
2020 Postseason · Ball State
28.4
11.5 primary · 45.6 efficiency · 10.6 usage
Milestones
5
Impact games
7
Splash games
13
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2017 · Rating 0.7793
Dupont Manual · Louisville, KY
- Committed To
- Ball State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2017
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
391
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 57 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.