Usage / Role
13%
Rotational defensive role
Player Dossier
2017-2019UTSA
DL • 6'2" • 270 lbs • Cibolo, TX, USA
Josh Croslen shows a ball-hunting defender profile with partial disruption data.
Usage / Role
13%
Rotational defensive role
Impact Production
16
Developing production for a defensive lineman
Reliability
16
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
29
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2017 Regular Season · Bowling Green
Snapshot
Player Story
Josh Croslen built his college career from 2017 through 2019 as a defensive lineman from Cibolo, TX wearing No. 96, spending time with Bowling Green and UTSA. The clearest part of Josh Croslen's career was his...
Read the storyJosh Croslen, DL. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2017 Regular Season · Bowling Green. Josh Croslen shows a ball-hunting defender profile with partial disruption data.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Tackles | TFL | Sacks | QB Hur | PD | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 8 | 16 | 1.5 | 1 | 3 | - | 0 | 41.8 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 9 | 21 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | 41.2 |
| 2019 Regular Season | UTSA | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
Related Context
Josh Croslen played DL for Bowling Green and UTSA. Across 3 tracked seasons, Josh Croslen recorded 37 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2018 with Bowling Green.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
Bowling Green paired 5.5 primary output with 15.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 9.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2019 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Bowling Green, UTSA.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ohio
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
9
Havoc Plays / G
0
Efficiency
9.7
Usage
1.7
Consistency
100
Best Game by takeover score
Ohio
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oregon: 0. Maryland: 0. Eastern Kentucky: 0. Miami (OH): 0. Georgia Tech: 0. Toledo: 0. Western Michigan: 0. Ohio: 0. Kent State: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oregon: 5 by 20.8. Maryland: 1 by 4.2. Eastern Kentucky: 2 by 8.3. Miami (OH): 1 by 4.2. Georgia Tech: 1 by 4.2. Toledo: 2 by 8.3. Western Michigan: 1 by 4.2. Ohio: 6 by 25. Kent State: 2 by 8.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Ohio
Best efficiency game
25 vs Ohio
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 10/31 | vs Kent State | L 28-35 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/20 | @ Ohio | L 14-49 | 6 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Western Michigan | L 35-42 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/6 | @ Toledo | L 36-52 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/29 | @ Georgia Tech | L 17-63 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Miami (OH) | L 23-38 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Eastern Kentucky | W 42-35 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Maryland | L 14-45 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/2 | @ Oregon | L 24-58 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Player Story
Josh Croslen built his college career from 2017 through 2019 as a defensive lineman from Cibolo, TX wearing No. 96, spending time with Bowling Green and UTSA. The clearest part of Josh Croslen's career was his defensive production: 37 tackles, 1.5 tackles for loss, and 1 sack across 17 career games in the available record. That gives Josh Croslen's career enough real context without stretching the story beyond the available production.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Bowling Green
2017-2018
Opening stop
UTSA
2019
Final stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 5.5 | 15.2 | 4.7 | — |
| 2018 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 0 | 9.7 | 1.7 | -5.5 |
| 2019 Regular Season | UTSA | 0 | — | — | 0 |
#1 Featured game
@ Eastern Michigan
Week 13 · L 31-34 · Conference game
Loss with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5
Havoc Plays
81.9 takeover
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 81.9 takeover score.
#2
@ Northwestern
Week 3 · L 7-49
2
Havoc Plays
67.5 takeover
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 67.5 takeover score.
#3
vs South Dakota
Week 2 · L 27-35
1
Havoc Plays
35 takeover
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 35 takeover score.
#4
@ Ohio
Week 8 · L 14-49 · Conference game
0
Havoc Plays
19.2 takeover
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 19.2 takeover score.
#5
@ Oregon
Week 1 · L 24-58
0
Havoc Plays
19.2 takeover
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 19.2 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2017 Regular Season · Bowling Green
5.5 primary output · 15.2 efficiency · 4.7 usage
41.8
#2
2018 Regular Season · Bowling Green
41.2
0 primary · 9.7 efficiency · 1.7 usage
#3
2019 Regular Season · UTSA
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
2
Impact games
2
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.