Usage Score
28.8
Player Dossier
2017-2020Bowling Green
TE • 6'4" • 251 lbs • Richmond, TX, USA
Quintin Morris reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
28.8
Efficiency
80.7
Consistency
72.6
Season Value
70.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Bowling Green
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Quintin Morris, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Bowling Green. Quintin Morris reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season
Bowling Green paired 649 primary output with 80.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 80.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2020 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Louisiana Tech
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 91.7th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
54.1
Efficiency
80.7
Usage
28.8
Consistency
72.6
Best Game by takeover score
Buffalo
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 65. Kansas State: 16. Louisiana Tech: 90. Kent State: 47. Notre Dame: 92. Toledo: 27. Central Michigan: 69. Western Michigan: 56. Akron: 53. Miami (OH): 13. Ohio: 86. Buffalo: 35
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 5 by 86.7. Kansas State: 1 by 100. Louisiana Tech: 6 by 100. Kent State: 4 by 78.3. Notre Dame: 10 by 61.3. Toledo: 2 by 90. Central Michigan: 4 by 100. Western Michigan: 8 by 46.7. Akron: 4 by 88.3. Miami (OH): 4 by 21.7. Ohio: 6 by 95.6. Buffalo: 1 by 100
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Louisiana Tech
Best efficiency game
100 vs Buffalo
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/29 | @ Buffalo | L 7-49 | — | 1 | 35 | 35 | 35 | 0 | 35 |
| Wed 11/20 | vs Ohio | L 24-66 | — | 6 | 86 | 14.3 | 14.30 | 1 | 26 |
| Thu 11/14 | @ Miami (OH) | L 3-44 | — | 4 | 13 | 3.3 | 3.30 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 11/2 | vs Akron | W 35-6 | — | 4 | 53 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 1 | 44 |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Western MichiganHigh volume | L 10-49 | — | 8 | 56 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Central Michigan | L 20-38 | — | 4 | 69 | 17.3 | 17.30 | 0 | 31 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Toledo | W 20-7 | — | 2 | 27 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Notre DameHigh volume | L 0-52 | — | 10 | 92 | 9.2 | 9.20 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 9/21 | @ Kent State | L 20-62 | — | 4 | 47 | 11.8 | 11.80 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Louisiana Tech | L 7-35 | — | 6 | 90 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 59 |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Kansas State | L 0-52 | — | 1 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 16 |
| Thu 8/29 | vs Unknown2+ TD | — | — | 5 | 65 | 13 | 13 | 2 | 27 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Bowling Green
2017-2020
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 116 | 78.1 | 5.6 | — |
| 2018 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 516 | 74.3 | 17.1 | 400 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 649 | 80.7 | 28.8 | 133 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 248 | 78 | 38.3 | -401 |
#1 Featured game
Akron
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
81
Primary metric
81 receiving yards with a 90 efficiency score.
#2
Louisiana Tech
90
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
90 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Ohio
69
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
69 receiving yards with a 76.7 efficiency score.
#4
Notre Dame
92
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
92 receiving yards with a 61.3 efficiency score.
#5
Maryland
85
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
85 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2019 Regular Season · Bowling Green
649 primary output · 80.7 efficiency · 28.8 usage
70.3
#2
2018 Regular Season · Bowling Green
58
516 primary · 74.3 efficiency · 17.1 usage
#3
2020 Regular Season · Bowling Green
55.8
248 primary · 78 efficiency · 38.3 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
3
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2017 · Rating 0.8081
George Ranch · Richmond, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
1,529
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 37 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Quintin Morris quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit