Usage Score
7.7
Player Dossier
2015-2018Bowling Green
DB • 6'4" • 190 lbs • Amory, MS, USA
Fred Garth shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 22.8 disruption score.
Usage Score
7.7
Efficiency
37.6
Consistency
50
Season Value
25.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Bowling Green
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Fred Garth, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Bowling Green. Fred Garth shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 22.8 disruption score.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
Bowling Green paired 6 primary output with 37.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 37.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2018 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ohio
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
0.5
Efficiency
37.6
Usage
7.7
Consistency
50
Best Game by takeover score
Eastern Michigan
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Michigan State: 1. Unknown: 0. Northwestern: 0. Middle Tennessee: 1. Akron: 0. Miami (OH): 1. Ohio: 1. Northern Illinois: 0. Kent State: 1. Buffalo: 0. Toledo: 0. Eastern Michigan: 1
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Michigan State: 2 by 18.3. Unknown: 6 by 25. Northwestern: 5 by 20.8. Middle Tennessee: 11 by 55.8. Akron: 9 by 37.5. Miami (OH): 7 by 39.2. Ohio: 8 by 43.3. Northern Illinois: 10 by 41.7. Kent State: 11 by 55.8. Buffalo: 8 by 33.3. Toledo: 13 by 50. Eastern Michigan: 5 by 30.8
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Ohio
Best efficiency game
55.8 vs Kent State
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 11/22 | @ Eastern Michigan | L 31-34 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Thu 11/16 | vs Toledo10+ tackles | L 37-66 | 13 | 7 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Wed 11/8 | @ Buffalo | L 28-38 | 8 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Wed 11/1 | @ Kent State10+ tackles | W 44-16 | 11 | 7 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | vs Northern Illinois10+ tackles | L 17-48 | 10 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | vs Ohio | L 30-48 | 8 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/7 | @ Miami (OH) | W 37-29 | 7 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/30 | vs Akron | L 23-34 | 9 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Middle Tennessee10+ tackles | L 13-24 | 11 | 10 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | @ Northwestern | L 7-49 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Unknown | — | 6 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/2 | @ Michigan State | L 10-35 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Bowling Green
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 6 | 37.6 | 7.7 | 6 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 2 | 22.8 | 5.3 | -4 |
#1 Featured game
Ohio
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1
Primary metric
1 disruption/tackle impact with 58.4 takeover score.
#2
Kent State
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 56 takeover score.
#3
Middle Tennessee
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 54.5 takeover score.
#4
Western Michigan
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 49.2 takeover score.
#5
Miami (OH)
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 47.8 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2017 Regular Season · Bowling Green
6 primary output · 37.6 efficiency · 7.7 usage
25.4
#2
2018 Regular Season · Bowling Green
9.6
2 primary · 22.8 efficiency · 5.3 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · Bowling Green
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
4
10+ tackle games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
134
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 20 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Fred Garth quick answers