Usage Score
3.2
Player Dossier
2018-2021Middle Tennessee
Cody Smith
LB • 6'2" • 211 lbs • Stuart, FL, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Cody Smith shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 15.8 disruption score.
Efficiency
15.8
Consistency
13.3
Season Value
11.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee
181819202121
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Middle Tennessee
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Troy
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Cody Smith, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee. Cody Smith shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 15.8 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season
Middle Tennessee paired 11 primary output with 28.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 15.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTSA
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2021 Postseason · Middle Tennessee
Games
10
Havoc Plays / G
0.5
Efficiency
15.8
Usage
3.2
Consistency
13.3
Best Game by takeover score
Toledo
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Toledo: 0. Unknown: 0. Virginia Tech: 0. UTSA: 2. Charlotte: 1. Marshall: 0. Liberty: 1. UConn: 0. Florida International: 0. Florida Atlantic: 0.5
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Toledo: 1 by 4.2. Unknown: 2 by 8.3. Virginia Tech: 1 by 4.2. UTSA: 9 by 57.5. Charlotte: 3 by 22.5. Marshall: 4 by 16.7. Liberty: 3 by 22.5. UConn: 2 by 8.3. Florida International: 1 by 4.2. Florida Atlantic: 1 by 9.2
Split Comparison
Wins0.1 · n=5 · -0.9 vs Losses
Losses1 · n=4 · +0.9 vs Wins
First Half0.6 · n=5 · +0.3 vs Second Half
Second Half0.3 · n=5 · -0.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
UTSA
Best efficiency game
57.5 vs UTSA
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/17 | @ Toledo | W 31-24 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/28 | @ Florida Atlantic | W 27-17 | 1 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/13 | vs Florida International | W 50-10 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 10/22 | @ UConn | W 44-13 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/9 | @ Liberty | L 13-41 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/2 | vs Marshall | W 34-28 | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 9/24 | @ Charlotte | L 39-42 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/18 | @ UTSA | L 13-27 | 9 | 4 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/11 | @ Virginia Tech | L 14-35 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/4 | vs Unknown | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Middle Tennessee
2018-2021
Opening stop
Season Progression
201820182019202020212021
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Postseason | Middle Tennessee | 1 | 11.3 | 1.9 | — |
| 2018 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 1 | 11.3 | 1.9 | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 2.5 | 10.8 | 2.6 | 1.5 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 11 | 28.4 | 9.6 | 8.5 |
| 2021 Postseason | Middle Tennessee | 4.5 | 15.8 | 3.2 | -6.5 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 4.5 | 15.8 | 3.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Troy
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way.
4.5
Primary metric
4.5 disruption/tackle impact with 68.2 takeover score.
#2
Rice
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 63.4 takeover score.
#3
UTSA
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 58.2 takeover score.
#4
Unknown
2
Primary metric
Game with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 45.7 takeover score.
#5
UAB
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 39.3 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2020 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee
11 primary output · 28.4 efficiency · 9.6 usage
19.9
#2
2021 Postseason · Middle Tennessee
11.2
4.5 primary · 15.8 efficiency · 3.2 usage
#3
2021 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee
11.2
4.5 primary · 15.8 efficiency · 3.2 usage
Milestones
2
Impact games
3
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2017 · Rating 0.8086
Martin County · Stuart, FL
- Committed To
- Middle Tennessee
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2017
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
104
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 38 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.