Usage Score
7.1
Player Dossier
2015-2018Middle Tennessee
DB • 6'1" • 192 lbs • Macon, MS, USA
Wesley Bush shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 30.5 disruption score.
Usage Score
7.1
Efficiency
30.5
Consistency
67.5
Season Value
29.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Wesley Bush, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee. Wesley Bush shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 30.5 disruption score.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
Middle Tennessee paired 10.5 primary output with 30.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 30.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2018 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Georgia
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.8
Efficiency
30.5
Usage
7.1
Consistency
67.5
Best Game by takeover score
UAB
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Vanderbilt: 0.5. Unknown: 1. Georgia: 2. Florida Atlantic: 0. Marshall: 1. Florida International: 1. Charlotte: 1. Old Dominion: 1. Western Kentucky: 0. UTEP: 1. Kentucky: 0. UAB: 1. UAB: 1
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Vanderbilt: 3 by 17.5. Unknown: 10 by 51.7. Georgia: 5 by 40.8. Florida Atlantic: 1 by 4.2. Marshall: 7 by 39.2. Florida International: 3 by 22.5. Charlotte: 6 by 35. Old Dominion: 3 by 22.5. Western Kentucky: 2 by 8.3. UTEP: 3 by 22.5. Kentucky: 12 by 50. UAB: 5 by 30.8. UAB: 10 by 51.7
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Georgia
Best efficiency game
51.7 vs UAB
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/1 | vs UAB10+ tackles | L 25-27 | 10 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/24 | vs UAB | W 27-3 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/17 | @ Kentucky10+ tackles | L 23-34 | 12 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/10 | @ UTEP | W 48-32 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Western Kentucky | W 29-10 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/27 | @ Old Dominion | W 51-17 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/20 | vs Charlotte | W 21-13 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/13 | @ Florida International | L 21-24 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Fri 10/5 | @ Marshall | W 34-24 | 7 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Florida Atlantic | W 25-24 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/15 | @ Georgia | L 7-49 | 5 | 3 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Unknown10+ tackles | — | 10 | 9 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/1 | @ Vanderbilt | L 7-35 | 3 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Middle Tennessee
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Middle Tennessee | 1 | 12.7 | 2.1 | 1 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 1 | 12.7 | 2.1 | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 10.5 | 30.5 | 7.1 | 9.5 |
#1 Featured game
Georgia
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 50.6 takeover score.
#2
Minnesota
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 41.5 takeover score.
#3
UAB
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 38.6 takeover score.
#4
Unknown
1
Primary metric
Game with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 37.3 takeover score.
#5
Marshall
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 31.8 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2018 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee
10.5 primary output · 30.5 efficiency · 7.1 usage
29.8
#2
2017 Postseason · Middle Tennessee
5.1
1 primary · 12.7 efficiency · 2.1 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee
5.1
1 primary · 12.7 efficiency · 2.1 usage
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
3
10+ tackle games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
92
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 21 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Wesley Bush quick answers