Usage Score
14.5
Player Dossier
2014-2019Middle Tennessee
D.Q. Thomas
LB • 5'10" • 200 lbs • Arlington, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
D.Q. Thomas shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 40.1 disruption score.
Efficiency
40.1
Consistency
61.2
Season Value
36.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Southern Miss
141516171818191919
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 9
- Program Path
- Middle Tennessee • Southern Miss
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Alabama
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
D.Q. Thomas, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Southern Miss. D.Q. Thomas shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 40.1 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
Southern Miss paired 23 primary output with 40.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 40.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Middle Tennessee, Southern Miss.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Alabama
Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Postseason · Southern Miss
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1.8
Efficiency
40.1
Usage
14.5
Consistency
61.2
Best Game by takeover score
Tulane
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Tulane: 1.5. Unknown: 3. Mississippi State: 0. Troy: 4. Alabama: 4. UTEP: 0. North Texas: 0.5. Louisiana Tech: 2. Rice: 2. UAB: 1. UTSA: 3. Western Kentucky: 2. Florida Atlantic: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Tulane: 8 by 48.3. Unknown: 7 by 59.2. Mississippi State: 8 by 33.3. Troy: 9 by 77.5. Alabama: 10 by 81.7. UTEP: 6 by 25. North Texas: 5 by 25.8. Louisiana Tech: 5 by 40.8. Rice: 3 by 32.5. UAB: 3 by 22.5. UTSA: 1 by 34.2. Western Kentucky: 5 by 40.8
Split Comparison
Wins1.8 · n=6 · +0.2 vs Losses
Losses1.6 · n=6 · -0.2 vs Wins
First Half1.9 · n=7 · +0.2 vs Second Half
Second Half1.7 · n=6 · -0.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Alabama
Best efficiency game
81.7 vs Alabama
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/4 | @ Tulane | L 13-30 | 8 | 6 | — | 1 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/30 | @ Florida Atlantic | L 17-34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/23 | vs Western KentuckySplash game | L 10-28 | 5 | 4 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/16 | @ UTSA | W 36-17 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/9 | vs UAB | W 37-2 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Rice | W 20-6 | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Louisiana Tech | L 30-45 | 5 | 4 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | vs North Texas | W 45-27 | 5 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/28 | vs UTEP | W 31-13 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/21 | @ Alabama10+ tackles · Splash game | L 7-49 | 10 | 8 | — | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Troy2+ sacks · Splash game | W 47-42 | 9 | 5 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Mississippi State | L 15-38 | 8 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/31 | vs UnknownSplash game | — | 7 | 5 | — | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Middle Tennessee
2014-2019
Opening stop
- 2
Southern Miss
2018-2019
Final stop
Season Progression
201420152016201720182018201920192019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 4.5 | 11.8 | 3.9 | 4.5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Southern Miss | 4 | 13.4 | 4.2 | -0.5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 4 | 13.4 | 4.2 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Southern Miss | 23 | 40.1 | 14.5 | 19 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Southern Miss | 23 | 40.1 | 14.5 | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 23 | 40.1 | 14.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Alabama
Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 70.9 takeover score.
#2
Troy
4
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 69.4 takeover score.
#3
Unknown
2
Primary metric
Game with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 52.7 takeover score.
#4
Unknown
3
Primary metric
Game with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 51 takeover score.
#5
Florida International
2.5
Primary metric
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 49.9 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Postseason · Southern Miss
23 primary output · 40.1 efficiency · 14.5 usage
36.9
#2
2019 Regular Season · Southern Miss
36.9
23 primary · 40.1 efficiency · 14.5 usage
#3
2019 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee
36.9
23 primary · 40.1 efficiency · 14.5 usage
Milestones
2
Impact games
5
Splash games
1
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
2
Career teams
9
Seasons tracked
95
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 28 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.