Usage / Role
9%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2018-2022SMU
WR • 6'1" • 192 lbs • La Porte, TX, USA
Austin Upshaw reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage / Role
9%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
19
Developing production for a receiver
Reliability
15
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
24
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2019 Regular Season · SMU
Snapshot
Player Story
Austin Upshaw built his college career from 2018 through 2022 as a wide receiver from La Porte, TX wearing No. 6, spending time with SMU. The clearest part of Austin Upshaw's career was his receiving role: 50...
Read the storyAustin Upshaw, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2019 Regular Season · SMU. Austin Upshaw reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | SMU | 1 | - | 0 | 1 | 50.2 |
| 2019 Regular Season | SMU | 2 | - | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| 2020 Regular Season | SMU | 6 | 18 | 218 | 1 | 67.8 |
| 2021 Regular Season | SMU | 9 | 14 | 103 | 0 | 36.7 |
| 2022 Postseason | SMU | 10 | 2 | 18 | 0 | 52.9 |
| 2022 Regular Season | SMU | 10 | 16 | 162 | 1 | 52.9 |
Related Context
Austin Upshaw played WR for SMU. Across 5 tracked seasons, Austin Upshaw recorded 10 passing yards, 8 rushing yards, and 501 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2020 with SMU.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season
SMU paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 57.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 88.9th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
18
Efficiency
57.8
Usage
8
Consistency
44.5
Best Game by takeover score
Tulsa
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. BYU: 18. North Texas: 6. Lamar: 17. Maryland: 22. TCU: 0. UCF: 51. Navy: 10. Cincinnati: 2. Tulsa: 45. Tulane: 9
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. BYU: 2 by 60. North Texas: 2 by 20. Lamar: 2 by 56.7. Maryland: 2 by 73.3. UCF: 3 by 100. Navy: 1 by 66.7. Cincinnati: 1 by 13.3. Tulsa: 3 by 100. Tulane: 2 by 30
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Tulsa
Best efficiency game
100 vs Tulsa
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/18 | @ BYU | L 23-24 | — | 2 | 18 | 5 | 9 | 0 | 14 |
| Fri 11/18 | @ Tulane | L 24-59 | — | 2 | 9 | 1.3 | 4.50 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Tulsa | W 45-34 | — | 3 | 45 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 38 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Cincinnati | L 27-29 | — | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Fri 10/14 | vs Navy | W 40-34 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Wed 10/5 | @ UCF | L 19-41 | — | 3 | 51 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs TCU | L 34-42 | — | — | — | -3 | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Maryland | L 27-34 | — | 2 | 22 | 11 | 11 | 1 | 13 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Lamar | W 45-16 | — | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/3 | @ North Texas | W 48-10 | — | 2 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
Player Story
Austin Upshaw built his college career from 2018 through 2022 as a wide receiver from La Porte, TX wearing No. 6, spending time with SMU. The clearest part of Austin Upshaw's career was his receiving role: 50 catches, 501 receiving yards, 2 touchdowns, and 8 rushing yards across 28 career games in the available record. His career also includes 10 passing yards, 8 rushing yards, and 5 tackles, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. That gives Austin Upshaw's career enough real context without stretching the story beyond the available production.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
SMU
2018-2022
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | SMU | 0 | — | 0.1 | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | SMU | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | SMU | 218 | 77.5 | 10 | 218 |
| 2021 Regular Season | SMU | 103 | 43.3 | 7.1 | -115 |
| 2022 Postseason | SMU | 180 | 57.8 | 8 | 77 |
| 2022 Regular Season | SMU | 180 | 57.8 | 8 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
@ East Carolina
Week 13 · L 38-52 · Conference game
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
78
Receiving Yards
80.4 takeover
78 receiving yards with a 65 efficiency score.
#2
@ Tulsa
Week 9 · W 45-34 · Conference game
45
Receiving Yards
80.3 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
45 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
@ UCF
Week 6 · L 19-41 · Conference game
51
Receiving Yards
76.8 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
51 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
@ Navy
Week 6 · W 31-24 · Conference game
37
Receiving Yards
68.7 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
37 receiving yards with a 61.7 efficiency score.
#5
vs Tulsa
Week 13 · L 31-34 · Conference game
32
Receiving Yards
65.3 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
32 receiving yards with a 71.1 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2019 Regular Season · SMU
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2020 Regular Season · SMU
67.8
218 primary · 77.5 efficiency · 10 usage
#3
2022 Postseason · SMU
52.9
180 primary · 57.8 efficiency · 8 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.