Usage / Role
49%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2016-2022Rutgers
QB • 6'1" • 200 lbs • Wahoo, NE, USA
Noah Vedral is a balanced quarterback profile with 12.5 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage / Role
49%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
6
Developing production for a quarterback
Reliability
15
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
14
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2021 Postseason · Rutgers
Snapshot
Player Story
Noah Vedral built his college career from 2016 through 2022 as a quarterback from Wahoo, NE, spending time with Nebraska, Rutgers, and UCF. The clearest part of Noah Vedral's career was his passing role: 4,051...
Read the storyNoah Vedral, QB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2021 Postseason · Rutgers. Noah Vedral is a balanced quarterback profile with 12.5 usage in the latest tracked season.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Total Offense | Pass Yds | Rush Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | UCF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2017 Regular Season | UCF | 6 | 353 | 276 | 77 | 3 | 46.5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Nebraska | 1 | 42 | 29 | 13 | 1 | 44.6 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Nebraska | 5 | 524 | 418 | 106 | 3 | 42.7 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Rutgers | 7 | 1,442 | 1,251 | 191 | 10 | 63.6 |
| 2021 Postseason | Rutgers | 13 | 104 | 87 | 17 | 0 | 68.9 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Rutgers | 13 | 2,006 | 1,726 | 280 | 9 | 68.9 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Rutgers | 4 | 310 | 264 | 46 | 2 | 34.3 |
Related Context
Noah Vedral played QB for UCF, Nebraska, and Rutgers. Across 7 tracked seasons, Noah Vedral recorded 4,051 passing yards, 730 rushing yards, and 22 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2021 with Rutgers.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason
Rutgers paired 2,110 primary output with 56.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 56.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2022 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across UCF, Nebraska, Rutgers.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Michigan State
Loss with 229 yards of offense and 55.6 efficiency. It landed in the 92.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Primary Metric / G
162.3
Efficiency
56.6
Usage
21.2
Consistency
71.9
Best Game by takeover score
Michigan State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Wake Forest: 104. Temple: 209. Syracuse: 130. Delaware: 338. Michigan: 202. Ohio State: 186. Michigan State: 229. Northwestern: 174. Illinois: 194. Wisconsin: 70. Indiana: 125. Penn State: 104. Maryland: 45
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wake Forest: 23 by 50.9. Temple: 36 by 69.3. Syracuse: 36 by 55.4. Delaware: 31 by 77.7. Michigan: 42 by 60.5. Ohio State: 34 by 51.7. Michigan State: 45 by 55.6. Northwestern: 41 by 55.6. Illinois: 27 by 73.9. Wisconsin: 21 by 35.5. Indiana: 23 by 61.8. Penn State: 31 by 50.3. Maryland: 15 by 37.1
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Michigan State
Best efficiency game
77.7 vs Delaware
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/31 | vs Wake Forest | L 10-38 | 8 | 13 | 87 | 61.5 | 0 | 1 | 50.9 | 10 | 17 | 1.70 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 11/27 | vs Maryland | L 16-40 | 7 | 14 | 45 | 50.0 | 0 | 1 | 37.1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 11/20 | @ Penn State | L 0-28 | 12 | 23 | 91 | 52.2 | 0 | 0 | 50.3 | 8 | 13 | 1.60 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 11/13 | @ Indiana | W 38-3 | 9 | 17 | 97 | 52.9 | 0 | 0 | 61.8 | 6 | 28 | 4.70 | 1 | 9 |
| Sat 11/6 | vs Wisconsin | L 3-52 | 8 | 16 | 81 | 50.0 | 0 | 2 | 35.5 | 5 | -11 | -2.20 | 0 | 1 |
| Sat 10/30 | @ IllinoisDual-threat | W 20-14 | 10 | 21 | 138 | 47.6 | 0 | 0 | 73.9 | 6 | 56 | 9.30 | 1 | 15 |
| Sat 10/16 | @ Northwestern | L 7-21 | 18 | 30 | 152 | 60.0 | 1 | 0 | 55.6 | 11 | 22 | 2 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/9 | vs Michigan State | L 13-31 | 16 | 31 | 208 | 51.6 | 0 | 0 | 55.6 | 14 | 21 | 1.50 | 0 | 33 |
| Sat 10/2 | vs Ohio State | L 13-52 | 16 | 26 | 152 | 61.5 | 1 | 3 | 51.7 | 8 | 34 | 4.30 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/25 | @ Michigan | L 13-20 | 18 | 31 | 156 | 58.1 | 1 | 0 | 60.5 | 11 | 46 | 4.20 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/18 | vs Delaware300-yard game | W 45-13 | 21 | 26 | 323 | 80.8 | 2 | 0 | 77.7 | 5 | 15 | 3 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 9/11 | @ Syracuse | W 17-7 | 22 | 28 | 145 | 78.6 | 1 | 0 | 55.4 | 8 | -15 | -1.90 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/4 | vs TempleDual-threat | W 61-14 | 15 | 27 | 138 | 55.6 | 1 | 0 | 69.3 | 9 | 71 | 7.90 | 0 | 15 |
Player Story
Noah Vedral built his college career from 2016 through 2022 as a quarterback from Wahoo, NE, spending time with Nebraska, Rutgers, and UCF. The clearest part of Noah Vedral's career was his passing role: 4,051 passing yards, 18 touchdown passes, 656 attempts, and 730 rushing yards across 36 career games in the available record. His career also includes 730 rushing yards, 22 receiving yards, and 1 tackle, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. That gives Noah Vedral's career enough real context without stretching the story beyond the available production.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UCF
2016-2017
Opening stop
Nebraska
2018-2019
Peak year stop
Rutgers
2020-2022
Final stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | UCF | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | UCF | 353 | 76 | 11.2 | 353 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Nebraska | 42 | 30.8 | 20.6 | -311 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Nebraska | 524 | 63.7 | 17.4 | 482 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Rutgers | 1,442 | 55.3 | 26.5 | 918 |
| 2021 Postseason | Rutgers | 2,110 | 56.6 | 21.2 | 668 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Rutgers | 2,110 | 56.6 | 21.2 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Rutgers | 310 | 42.4 | 12.5 | -1,800 |
#1 Featured game
@ Minnesota
Week 7 · L 7-34 · Conference game
Loss with 184 yards of offense and 60.6 efficiency.
184
Total Offense
73.7 takeover
184 total offense with 60.6 efficiency.
#2
vs Austin Peay
Week 9 · W 73-33
109
Total Offense
73.1 takeover
Win with 109 yards of offense and 88.5 efficiency.
109 total offense with 88.5 efficiency.
#3
vs Michigan
Week 12 · L 42-48 · Conference game
389
Total Offense
71.4 takeover
Loss with 389 yards of offense and 64.1 efficiency.
389 total offense with 64.1 efficiency.
#4
vs Indiana
Week 9 · L 31-38 · Conference game
222
Total Offense
70.2 takeover
Loss with 222 yards of offense and 79.4 efficiency.
222 total offense with 79.4 efficiency.
#5
vs Michigan State
Week 6 · L 13-31 · Conference game
229
Total Offense
69.9 takeover
Loss with 229 yards of offense and 55.6 efficiency.
229 total offense with 55.6 efficiency.
#1 Season by Season Value
2021 Postseason · Rutgers
2,110 primary output · 56.6 efficiency · 21.2 usage
68.9
#2
2021 Regular Season · Rutgers
68.9
2,110 primary · 56.6 efficiency · 21.2 usage
#3
2020 Regular Season · Rutgers
63.6
1,442 primary · 55.3 efficiency · 26.5 usage
2
250+ passing yards
2
300+ total offense
1
3+ TD games
16
Above avg efficiency
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.