Usage Score
44.5
Player Dossier
2017-2019Arizona State
Eno Benjamin
RB • 5'10" • 201 lbs • Wylie, TX, USA
Workhorse runnerSteady chain mover
Eno Benjamin leans workhorse runner traits and 47.4 efficiency.
Efficiency
54
Consistency
71.5
Season Value
67.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Arizona State
1717181819
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Arizona State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Oregon State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Eno Benjamin, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Arizona State. Eno Benjamin leans workhorse runner traits and 47.4 efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Arizona State paired 1,903 primary output with 54 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 54 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2019 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Oregon State
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Postseason · Arizona State
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
146.4
Efficiency
54
Usage
44.5
Consistency
71.5
Best Game by takeover score
Fresno State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Fresno State: 134. UTSA: 146. Michigan State: 81. San Diego State: 65. Washington: 118. Oregon State: 339. Colorado: 122. Stanford: 79. USC: 185. Utah: 175. UCLA: 195. Oregon: 151. Arizona: 113
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Fresno State: 25 by 54.4. UTSA: 18 by 83.8. Michigan State: 19 by 30.7. San Diego State: 20 by 23.6. Washington: 29 by 42. Oregon State: 33 by 92.8. Colorado: 30 by 43.7. Stanford: 15 by 43.5. USC: 29 by 66.5. Utah: 27 by 67.5. UCLA: 36 by 56. Oregon: 30 by 53.1. Arizona: 23 by 44.3
Split Comparison
Wins176.3 · n=7 · +64.8 vs Losses
Losses111.5 · n=6 · -64.8 vs Wins
First Half143.6 · n=7 · -6.1 vs Second Half
Second Half149.7 · n=6 · +6.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Oregon State
Best efficiency game
92.8 vs Oregon State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/15 | @ Fresno State100 rush yards | L 20-31 | 23 | 118 | 5.10 | 1 | 2 | 16 | 5.4 |
| Sat 11/24 | @ Arizona2+ TD | W 41-40 | 21 | 80 | 3.80 | 3 | 2 | 33 | 4.9 |
| Sun 11/18 | @ Oregon100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | L 29-31 | 29 | 149 | 5.10 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5.0 |
| Sat 11/10 | vs UCLA100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 31-28 | 34 | 182 | 5.40 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 5.4 |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Utah100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 38-20 | 27 | 175 | 6.50 | 2 | — | — | 6.5 |
| Sat 10/27 | @ USC100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 38-35 | 29 | 185 | 6.40 | 2 | — | — | 6.4 |
| Fri 10/19 | vs Stanford | L 13-20 | 11 | 38 | 3.50 | 0 | 4 | 41 | 5.3 |
| Sat 10/6 | @ Colorado100 rush yards · 2+ TD | L 21-28 | 28 | 120 | 4.30 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4.1 |
| Sun 9/30 | vs Oregon State100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 52-24 | 30 | 312 | 10.40 | 3 | 3 | 27 | 10.3 |
| Sun 9/23 | @ Washington100 rush yards | L 20-27 | 26 | 104 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 14 | 4.1 |
| Sun 9/16 | @ San Diego State | L 21-28 | 13 | 21 | 1.60 | 0 | 7 | 44 | 3.3 |
| Sun 9/9 | vs Michigan State | W 16-13 | 13 | 27 | 2.10 | 0 | 6 | 54 | 4.3 |
| Sun 9/2 | vs UTSA100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 49-7 | 16 | 131 | 8.20 | 1 | 2 | 15 | 8.1 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Arizona State
2017-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
20172017201820182019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Postseason | Arizona State | 157 | 43.7 | 4.9 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Arizona State | 157 | 43.7 | 4.9 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Arizona State | 1,903 | 54 | 44.5 | 1,746 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Arizona State | 1,903 | 54 | 44.5 | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Arizona State | 1,430 | 47.4 | 45.3 | -473 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Oregon State
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
339
Primary metric
339 scrimmage yards and 53.2 usage.
#2
Washington State
171
Primary metric
Win with 171 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
171 scrimmage yards and 43.1 usage.
#3
Arizona
182
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
182 scrimmage yards and 58.7 usage.
#4
NC State
61
Primary metric
Loss with 61 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
61 scrimmage yards and 12.7 usage.
#5
Oregon
168
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
168 scrimmage yards and 57.1 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · Arizona State
1,903 primary output · 54 efficiency · 44.5 usage
67.5
#2
2018 Regular Season · Arizona State
67.5
1,903 primary · 54 efficiency · 44.5 usage
#3
2019 Regular Season · Arizona State
62.4
1,430 primary · 47.4 efficiency · 45.3 usage
Milestones
18
100+ rush yards
9
150+ scrimmage yards
9
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2017 · Rating 0.94
Wylie East · Wylie, TX
- Committed To
- Arizona State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2017
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
3,490
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 34 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.