Usage Score
7.3
Player Dossier
2017-2020Rutgers
Brendon White
DB • 6'2" • 220 lbs • Powell, OH, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Brendon White shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 33.3 disruption score.
Efficiency
25.7
Consistency
13.3
Season Value
16.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Ohio State
1718181920
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Ohio State • Rutgers
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Washington
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Brendon White, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Ohio State. Brendon White shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 33.3 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
Ohio State paired 0 primary output with 4.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 25.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2020 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Ohio State, Rutgers.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Washington
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Postseason · Ohio State
Games
10
Havoc Plays / G
0.7
Efficiency
25.7
Usage
7.3
Consistency
13.3
Best Game by takeover score
Washington
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Washington: 3. Oregon State: 0. Rutgers: 0. Tulane: 0. Purdue: 0. Nebraska: 2. Michigan State: 1. Maryland: 0. Michigan: 1. Northwestern: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Washington: 8 by 63.3. Oregon State: 2 by 8.3. Rutgers: 1 by 4.2. Tulane: 1 by 4.2. Purdue: 1 by 4.2. Nebraska: 13 by 70. Michigan State: 5 by 30.8. Maryland: 5 by 20.8. Michigan: 5 by 30.8. Northwestern: 5 by 20.8
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0.8 · Games = 9
First Half0.6 · Games = 5 · -0.2 vs Second Half
Second Half0.8 · Games = 5 · +0.2 vs First Half
All Games0.7 · Games = 10
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Washington
Best efficiency game
70 vs Nebraska
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/1 | vs WashingtonSplash game | W 28-23 | 8 | 8 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 12/2 | vs Northwestern | W 45-24 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/24 | vs Michigan | W 62-39 | 5 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/17 | @ Maryland | W 52-51 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/10 | @ Michigan State | W 26-6 | 5 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Nebraska10+ tackles · Splash game | W 36-31 | 13 | 8 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/20 | @ Purdue | L 20-49 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Tulane | W 49-6 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Rutgers | W 52-3 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Oregon State | W 77-31 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Ohio State
2017-2019
Opening stop
- 2
Rutgers
2020
Final stop
Season Progression
20172018201820192020
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Regular Season | Ohio State | 0 | 4.2 | 0.8 | — |
| 2018 Postseason | Ohio State | 7 | 25.7 | 7.3 | 7 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Ohio State | 7 | 25.7 | 7.3 | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Ohio State | 4 | 13.2 | 3 | -3 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Rutgers | 2.5 | 33.3 | 5.9 | -1.5 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Washington
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 60.5 takeover score.
#2
Nebraska
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 53.9 takeover score.
#3
Cincinnati
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 47.8 takeover score.
#4
Florida Atlantic
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 46 takeover score.
#5
Michigan State
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 45.6 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Regular Season · Ohio State
0 primary output · 4.2 efficiency · 0.8 usage
35
#2
2020 Regular Season · Rutgers
25.6
2.5 primary · 33.3 efficiency · 5.9 usage
#3
2018 Postseason · Ohio State
16.1
7 primary · 25.7 efficiency · 7.3 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
2
Splash games
3
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2017 · Rating 0.9421
Olentangy Liberty · Powell, OH
- Committed To
- Ohio State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2017
Career Facts
2
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
102
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 25 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.