Usage Score
16.4
Player Profile
WR • 6'0" • 200 lbs • Desoto, TX, USA
Reggie Roberson Jr. reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
16.4
Efficiency
75.9
Consistency
72
Season Value
60.2
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · SMU
Quick Facts
Reggie Roberson Jr., WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · SMU. Reggie Roberson Jr. reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
SMU paired 735 primary output with 81.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 75.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across West Virginia, SMU.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Navy
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
52.1
Efficiency
75.9
Usage
16.4
Consistency
72
Best Game by takeover score
Tulsa
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 59. North Texas: 41. Louisiana Tech: 71. TCU: 40. South Florida: 54. Navy: 100. Tulane: 41. Houston: 58. Memphis: 33. UCF: 70. Cincinnati: 7. Tulsa: 51
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 3 by 100. North Texas: 5 by 54.7. Louisiana Tech: 6 by 78.9. TCU: 3 by 88.9. South Florida: 5 by 72. Navy: 5 by 100. Tulane: 3 by 91.1. Houston: 5 by 77.3. Memphis: 3 by 73.3. UCF: 7 by 66.7. Cincinnati: 2 by 23.3. Tulsa: 4 by 85
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Navy
Best efficiency game
100 vs Navy
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/27 | vs Tulsa | L 31-34 | — | 4 | 51 | 12.8 | 12.80 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 11/20 | @ Cincinnati | L 14-48 | — | 2 | 7 | 3.5 | 3.50 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 11/13 | vs UCF | W 55-28 | — | 7 | 70 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 24 |
| Sat 11/6 | @ Memphis | L 25-28 | — | 3 | 33 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/30 | @ Houston | L 37-44 | — | 5 | 58 | 11.6 | 11.60 | 0 | 26 |
| Thu 10/21 | vs Tulane | W 55-26 | — | 3 | 41 | 13.7 | 13.70 | 1 | 22 |
| Sat 10/9 | @ Navy100 receiving yards | W 31-24 | — | 5 | 100 | 20 | 20 | 1 | 66 |
| Sat 10/2 | vs South Florida | W 41-17 | — | 5 | 54 | 10.8 | 10.80 | 1 | 21 |
| Sat 9/25 | @ TCU | W 42-34 | — | 3 | 40 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 1 | 29 |
| Sat 9/18 | @ Louisiana Tech | W 39-37 | — | 6 | 71 | 11.8 | 11.80 | 1 | 33 |
| Sat 9/11 | vs North Texas | W 35-12 | — | 5 | 41 | 8.2 | 8.20 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 9/4 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 59 | 19.7 | 19.70 | 0 | 47 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
West Virginia
2015-2017
Opening stop
SMU
2018-2021
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | West Virginia | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | West Virginia | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | West Virginia | 30 | 35.9 | 8 | 30 |
| 2018 Regular Season | SMU | 735 | 81.8 | 22.2 | 705 |
| 2019 Regular Season | SMU | 803 | 84.1 | 22.3 | 68 |
| 2020 Regular Season | SMU | 474 | 93.3 | 22.2 | -329 |
| 2021 Regular Season | SMU | 625 | 75.9 | 16.4 | 151 |
#1 Featured game
Cincinnati
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
147
Primary metric
147 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Temple
250
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
250 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Houston
134
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
134 receiving yards with a 99.3 efficiency score.
#4
Navy
100
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
100 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Memphis
243
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
243 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2018 Regular Season · SMU
735 primary output · 81.8 efficiency · 22.2 usage
65
#2
2019 Regular Season · SMU
64.1
803 primary · 84.1 efficiency · 22.3 usage
#3
2021 Regular Season · SMU
60.2
625 primary · 75.9 efficiency · 16.4 usage
10
100+ receiving yards
4
8+ catch outings
5
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2017 · Rating 0.8556
Horn · Mesquite, TX
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
2,667
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 36 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.
Reggie Roberson Jr. quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit